Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 864/13, 17392/13, 22165/13, 47938/13, 52867/13, 54100/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 864/13, 17392/13, 22165/13, 47938/13, 52867/13, 54100/13 (https://dejure.org/2015,11039)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21.05.2015 - 864/13, 17392/13, 22165/13, 47938/13, 52867/13, 54100/13 (https://dejure.org/2015,11039)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21. Mai 2015 - 864/13, 17392/13, 22165/13, 47938/13, 52867/13, 54100/13 (https://dejure.org/2015,11039)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,11039) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DRAGUNA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Art. 3 MRK
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
DRAGUNA v. ROMANIA
Art. 3 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 864/13
The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 90-94, ECHR 2000-XI; Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 139-165, 10 January 2012); it recalls in particular that extreme lack of space in a prison cell or overcrowding weighs heavily as an aspect to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the impugned detention conditions were "degrading" from the point of view of Article 3; it may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see, amongst many authorities, Karalevicius v. Lithuania, no. 53254/99, §§ 36-40, 7 April 2005). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 864/13
The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 90-94, ECHR 2000-XI; Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 139-165, 10 January 2012); it recalls in particular that extreme lack of space in a prison cell or overcrowding weighs heavily as an aspect to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the impugned detention conditions were "degrading" from the point of view of Article 3; it may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see, amongst many authorities, Karalevicius v. Lithuania, no. 53254/99, §§ 36-40, 7 April 2005). - EGMR, 07.04.2005 - 53254/99
KARALEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 864/13
The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 90-94, ECHR 2000-XI; Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 139-165, 10 January 2012); it recalls in particular that extreme lack of space in a prison cell or overcrowding weighs heavily as an aspect to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the impugned detention conditions were "degrading" from the point of view of Article 3; it may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see, amongst many authorities, Karalevicius v. Lithuania, no. 53254/99, §§ 36-40, 7 April 2005).