Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ZHUK v. UKRAINE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65

  DELCOURT c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 45783/05

  In addition, the Court reiterates that a State which institutes courts of appeal or cassation is required to ensure that persons amenable to the law shall enjoy before these courts the fundamental guarantees contained in Article 6 (see, for example, Delcourt v. Belgium, 17 January 1970, § 25, Series A no. 11).
• EGMR, 22.02.1984 - 8209/78

  Sutter ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 45783/05

  As the competence of the Supreme Court in the present case was limited to questions of law, the lack of a public hearing before it was not in breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention per se (see, for example, Sutter v. Switzerland, 22 February 1984, § 30, Series A no. 74 and Bulut v. Austria, 22 February 1996, § 42, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-II).
• EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 12005/86

  BORGERS v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 45783/05

  In this context, importance is to be attached to, inter alia, the appearance of the fair administration of justice and to the increased sensitivity of the public to the fair administration of justice (see Borger v. Belgium, 30 October 1991, § 24 in fine, Series A no. 214-B).

• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 32541/08

  Keine Käfige für Angeklagte

  De plus, le fait que le traitement dénoncé a été infligé aux requérants dans la salle d'audience pendant leur procès fait entrer en jeu le principe de la présomption d'innocence en matière pénale, qui constitue l'un des attributs du procès équitable (voir, mutatis mutandis, Allen c. Royaume-Uni [GC], no 25424/09, § 94, CEDH 2013), et l'importance que revêt l'apparence d'une bonne administration de la justice (voir Borgers c. Belgique, 30 octobre 1991, § 24, série A no 214-B, Zhuk c. Ukraine, no 45783/05, § 27, 21 octobre 2010, et Atanasov c. l'ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine, no 22745/06, § 31, 17 février 2011).
• EGMR, 16.06.2016 - 11984/06

  KUZMINA v. UKRAINE

  The relevant provisions of the domestic law, applicable at the material time, can be found in the judgment in the case of Zhuk v. Ukraine (no. 45783/05, §§ 18-20, 21 October 2010).