Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RADANOVIC v. CROATIA

  Art. 13, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of P1-1 Violation of Art. 13 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses award - domestic proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 9056/02
• EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 9056/02
• EGMR, 04.07.2018 - 9056/02

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 9056/02

  The Court therefore has to determine whether the remedies to which the applicant had recourse, or which were otherwise available, were "effective" in the sense of either preventing the alleged violation of her right to property or its continuation, or of providing adequate redress for any violation that had already occurred (see, mutatis mutandis, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 158, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 22774/93

  IMMOBILIARE SAFFI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 9056/02

  Therefore, the interference complained of constituted a control of use of property within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, mutatis mutandis, Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 46 and 48, ECHR 1999-V; and Scollo v. Italy, judgment of 28 September 1995, Series A no. 315-C, p. 52, § 27).

• EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 51920/09

  BAKHSHIYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  The Court considers that the applicants must have suffered pecuniary damage as a result of their lack of control over their flats and finds that there is a causal link between the violations found and the pecuniary damage claimed in respect of lost rent (compare Radanovic v. Croatia, no. 9056/02, §§ 62-66, 21 December 2006).
• EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 7867/09

  GASIMOVA AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  As to the claims in respect of lost rent, the Court considers that the applicants must have suffered pecuniary damage as a result of their lack of control over their flats and finds that there is a causal link between the violations found and the pecuniary damage claimed in respect of lost rent (compare Radanovic v. Croatia, no. 9056/02, §§ 62-66, 21 December 2006).
• EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 38798/07

  GULMAMMADOVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  In such situations, a wide margin of appreciation should be accorded to the respondent State (see, mutatis mutandis, Radanovic v. Croatia, no. 9056/02, § 49, 21 December 2006).
• EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 50757/07

  HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  In such situations, a wide margin of appreciation should be accorded to the respondent State (see, mutatis mutandis, Radanovic v. Croatia, no. 9056/02, § 49, 21 December 2006).