Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.06.2011 - 59461/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,55231) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MATUSHEVSKYY AND MATUSHEVSKA v. UKRAINE
Art. 2, Art. 3 MRK
Violation of Art. 2 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 2 (procedural aspect) Violation of Art. 3 (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2011 - 59461/08
The Court emphasises that Article 2 enshrines one of the basic values of the democratic societies making up the Council of Europe and ranks as one of the most fundamental provisions in the Convention (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 147, Series A no. 324). - EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
MAKARATZIS c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2011 - 59461/08
While the obligation to investigate is of means only and there is no absolute right to obtain a prosecution or conviction, any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its capability of establishing the circumstances of the case or the person responsible is liable to fall foul of the required standard of effectiveness (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 74, ECHR 2004-XI). - EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93
MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2011 - 59461/08
The Court does not deem it necessary to make a separate finding under Article 3 in respect of the deficiencies in the investigation, having already dealt with that question under Article 2 of the Convention (see paragraphs 73-88 above; and, for the case-law, see Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 120, ECHR 2000-III). - EGMR, 08.10.2009 - 37083/03
TEBIETI MÜHAFIZE CEMIYYETI AND ISRAFILOV c. AZERBAIDJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2011 - 59461/08
As can be seen from the case file materials, Ms Topolevska has been representing the applicants throughout the proceedings before the Court and is therefore entitled to seek payment of her fees under the contract, which, according to the currency exchange rate as of June 2008, are equal to about EUR 1, 000. Accordingly, the Court considers those fees to have been "actually incurred" (see Tebieti Mühafize Cemiyyeti and Israfilov v. Azerbaijan, no. 37083/03, § 106, ECHR 2009-...).