Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.09.1998 - 24755/94 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
McLEOD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 41, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine P1-1 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
McLEOD c. ROYAUME-UNI
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 41, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
Violation de l'art. 8 Non-lieu à examiner P1-1 Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure nationale Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention (französisch)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 26.06.1996 - 24755/94
- EGMR, 23.09.1998 - 24755/94
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74
SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.1998 - 24755/94
However, those consequences need not be foreseeable with absolute certainty, since such certainty might give rise to excessive rigidity, and the law must be able to keep pace with changing circumstances (see, mutatis mutandis, the Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1) judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 31, § 49). - EGMR, 24.03.1988 - 10465/83
OLSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.1998 - 24755/94
The Court recalls that, according to its established case-law, the notion of necessity implies that the interference corresponds to a pressing social need and, in particular, that it is proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued (see, inter alia, the Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1) judgment of 24 March 1988, Series A no. 130, pp. - EGMR, 25.02.1992 - 12963/87
MARGARETA AND ROGER ANDERSSON v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.1998 - 24755/94
It also refers to the quality of the law in question, requiring that it be accessible to the persons concerned and formulated with sufficient precision to enable them - if need be, with appropriate advice - to foresee, to a degree that is reasonable in the circumstances, the consequences which a given action may entail (see, amongst many others, the Margareta and Roger Andersson v. Sweden judgment of 25 February 1992, Series A no. 226-A, p. 25, § 75).