Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 32230/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,14680) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BANTEA v. ROMANIA
Partly struck out of the list;Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 32230/04
To this end, the Court has examined the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Sp. z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 22.11.2007 - 20366/04
SFRIJAN c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 32230/04
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in connection with the breach of the legal certainty principle as a consequence of the quashing of a final judgment given in the applicant's favour following an extraordinary appeal initiated by the Procurator General of Romania (see for instance Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, §§ 60-65, ECHR 1999-VII and Sfrijan v. Romania, no. 20366/04, §§ 29-34, 22 November 2007).