Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  FREIMANN v. CROATIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 10.07.2003 - 58112/00

  MULTIPLEX v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2004 - 5266/02

  The Court finds, in accordance with its case-law (see Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 33, ECHR 2002-II and Multiplex v. Croatia, no. 58112/00, § 55, 10 July 2003), that the long period for which the applicant was prevented from having her civil claim determined by domestic courts as a consequence of a legislative measure constitutes a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

• EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 33250/02

  BIJELIC v. CROATIA

  The Court recalls its previous judgments in which it held that long periods for which those applicants were prevented from having their civil claims determined as a consequence of the 1996 Amendment constituted violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, for example, Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 33, ECHR 2002-II, and Freimann v. Croatia, no. 5266/02, § 28, 24 June 2004).
• EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 13854/02

  MARINKOVIC v. CROATIA

  The Court recalls its previous judgments in which it held that long periods for which those applicants were prevented from having their civil claims determined as a consequence of the 1996 Act constituted a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, for example, Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 33, ECHR 2002-II, and Freimann v. Croatia, no. 5266/02, § 28, 24 June 2004).