Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 56305/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,60362) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GETOS-MAGDIC v. CROATIA
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 03.09.2009 - 56305/08
- EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 56305/08
- EGMR, 02.12.2010 - 56305/08
- EGMR - 56305/08 (anhängig)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 59498/00
BURDOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 56305/08
In this regard, the question whether an applicant can claim to be a victim of the violation alleged is relevant at all stages of the proceedings under the Convention (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 30, ECHR 2002-III, and Trepashkin v. Russia, no. 36898/03, § 67, 19 July 2007). - EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 13616/88
HENTRICH v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 56305/08
The purpose of Article 35 is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, for example, Hentrich v. France, 22 September 1994, § 33, Series A no. 296-A, and Remli v. France, 23 April 1996, § 33, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-II). - EGMR, 19.07.2007 - 36898/03
TREPASHKIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 56305/08
In this regard, the question whether an applicant can claim to be a victim of the violation alleged is relevant at all stages of the proceedings under the Convention (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 30, ECHR 2002-III, and Trepashkin v. Russia, no. 36898/03, § 67, 19 July 2007). - EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 46947/99
KOC ET TAMBAS c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 56305/08
Such acknowledgment and redress are usually the result of the process of exhaustion of domestic remedies (see Koç and Tambas v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46947/99, 24 February 2005).