Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 4692/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,21975) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
UÇAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Art. 6, Art. 10, Art. 11, Art. 14, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9267/81
MATHIEU-MOHIN ET CLERFAYT c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 4692/09
In the case of Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, the 1980 constitutional reform had vested in the Flemish Council sufficient competence and powers to make it, alongside the French Community Council and the Walloon Regional Council, a constituent part of the Belgian "legislature", in addition to the House of Representatives and the Senate (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, § 53 Series A no. 113, and Matthews v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24833/94, § 40, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 11.04.2006 - 56550/00
MÓLKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 4692/09
In any event, even assuming that the Constitutional Court's decision concerned the applicants" right to stand as candidates or to choose their representatives in the local elections, and that this decision had a direct bearing on the applicants" situation, the proceedings in question could only be deemed to relate to the applicants" political rights, and not their "civil" rights within the meaning of Article 6 of the Convention (see Cherepkov v. Russia (dec.), no. 51501/99, ECHR 2000-I, and Mólka v. Poland (dec.), no. 56550/00, ECHR 2006-IV). - EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 30877/02
NOSOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 4692/09
The Court reiterates that a person cannot complain about a violation of his or her rights in proceedings to which he or she was not a party (see, mutatis mutandis, Nosov v. Russia (dec.), no. 30877/02, 20 October 2005). - EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 51501/99
CHEREPKOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 4692/09
In any event, even assuming that the Constitutional Court's decision concerned the applicants" right to stand as candidates or to choose their representatives in the local elections, and that this decision had a direct bearing on the applicants" situation, the proceedings in question could only be deemed to relate to the applicants" political rights, and not their "civil" rights within the meaning of Article 6 of the Convention (see Cherepkov v. Russia (dec.), no. 51501/99, ECHR 2000-I, and Mólka v. Poland (dec.), no. 56550/00, ECHR 2006-IV). - EGMR, 01.02.2001 - 55346/00
AYUNTAMIENTO DE MULA contre l'ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 4692/09
They are therefore quite clearly governmental organisations (see Ayuntamiento de Mula v. Spain (dec.), no. 55346/00, ECHR 2001-I).