Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 24.11.1997 - 20602/92 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,15524) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SZÜCS c. AUTRICHE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation de l'Art. 6-1 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure nationale et de la Convention ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SZÜCS v. AUSTRIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch) - Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte
(englisch)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 29.06.1994 - 20602/92
- EKMR, 23.10.1995 - 20602/92
- EKMR, 03.09.1996 - 20602/92
- EGMR, 24.11.1997 - 20602/92
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 18160/91
DIENNET v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1997 - 20602/92
By rendering the administration of justice transparent, publicity contributes to the achievement of the aim of Article 6 § 1, namely a fair trial, the guarantee of which is one of the fundamental principles of any democratic society, within the meaning of the Convention (see, for example, the Diennet v. France judgment of 26 September 1995, Series A no. 325-A, pp. 14-15, § 33). - EGMR, 22.02.1984 - 8209/78
Sutter ./. Schweiz
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1997 - 20602/92
Lastly, in the Sutter v. Switzerland case (see the judgment of 22 February 1984, Series A no. 74, pp. 14-15, § 34) it held that public delivery of a decision of the Military Court of Cassation was unnecessary, as public access to that decision was ensured by other means, namely the possibility of seeking a copy of the judgment from the court registry and its subsequent publication in an official collection of case-law. - EGMR, 08.12.1983 - 8273/78
Axen ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1997 - 20602/92
In the Axen v. Germany case (see the judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 72, p. 14, § 32), it held that public delivery of a decision of a supreme court was unnecessary given that the judgments of the lower courts had been pronounced publicly.
- EGMR, 26.03.1992 - 11760/85
ÉDITIONS PÉRISCOPE v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1997 - 20602/92
For a right to be a civil one, it is sufficient that the subject matter of the action should be pecuniary and that the action should be founded on an alleged infringement of rights which are likewise pecuniary rights (see the Editions Périscope v. France judgment of 26 March 1992, Series A no. 234-B, p. 66, § 40). - EGMR, 08.12.1983 - 7984/77
PRETTO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1997 - 20602/92
Furthermore, the limited jurisdiction of the courts, which had to rule only on whether the suspicion concerning the applicant had been dispelled, justified not delivering the decisions in public, as in the Pretto and Others v. Italy case (see the judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 71). - EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 15346/89
MASSON AND VAN ZON v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1997 - 20602/92
The Government, on the other hand, considered that in particular the proceedings relating to his compensation claim under section 2 (1) (b) of the Compensation (Criminal Proceedings) Act (see paragraphs 13-16 above) were not covered by Article 6, on the ground that, as in the case of Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands (judgment of 28 September 1995, Series A no. 327-A), the applicant had not had a "right" in domestic law.