Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 24.11.1997 - 20602/92   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1997,15524
EGMR, 24.11.1997 - 20602/92 (https://dejure.org/1997,15524)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.11.1997 - 20602/92 (https://dejure.org/1997,15524)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. November 1997 - 20602/92 (https://dejure.org/1997,15524)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,15524) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 08.12.1983 - 8273/78

    Axen ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1997 - 20602/92
    In the Axen v. Germany case (see the judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 72, p. 14, § 32), it held that public delivery of a decision of a supreme court was unnecessary given that the judgments of the lower courts had been pronounced publicly.
  • EGMR, 08.12.1983 - 7984/77

    PRETTO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1997 - 20602/92
    Furthermore, the limited jurisdiction of the courts, which had to rule only on whether the suspicion concerning the applicant had been dispelled, justified not delivering the decisions in public, as in the Pretto and Others v. Italy case (see the judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 71).
  • EGMR, 22.02.1984 - 8209/78

    Sutter ./. Schweiz

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1997 - 20602/92
    Lastly, in the Sutter v. Switzerland case (see the judgment of 22 February 1984, Series A no. 74, pp. 14-15, § 34) it held that public delivery of a decision of the Military Court of Cassation was unnecessary, as public access to that decision was ensured by other means, namely the possibility of seeking a copy of the judgment from the court registry and its subsequent publication in an official collection of case-law.
  • EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 15346/89

    MASSON AND VAN ZON v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1997 - 20602/92
    The Government, on the other hand, considered that in particular the proceedings relating to his compensation claim under section 2 (1) (b) of the Compensation (Criminal Proceedings) Act (see paragraphs 13-16 above) were not covered by Article 6, on the ground that, as in the case of Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands (judgment of 28 September 1995, Series A no. 327-A), the applicant had not had a "right" in domestic law.
  • EGMR, 26.03.1992 - 11760/85

    ÉDITIONS PÉRISCOPE v. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1997 - 20602/92
    For a right to be a civil one, it is sufficient that the subject matter of the action should be pecuniary and that the action should be founded on an alleged infringement of rights which are likewise pecuniary rights (see the Editions Périscope v. France judgment of 26 March 1992, Series A no. 234-B, p. 66, § 40).
  • EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 18160/91

    DIENNET v. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1997 - 20602/92
    By rendering the administration of justice transparent, publicity contributes to the achievement of the aim of Article 6 § 1, namely a fair trial, the guarantee of which is one of the fundamental principles of any democratic society, within the meaning of the Convention (see, for example, the Diennet v. France judgment of 26 September 1995, Series A no. 325-A, pp. 14-15, § 33).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht