Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BULIC v. CROATIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BULIC v. CROATIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 39158/21

  ALIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2023 - 32997/15

  Accordingly, the procedure for reopening proceedings, the most appropriate way of redressing the violation alleged in the present case, would not be available were the Court to accept the Government's unilateral declaration (compare also Keskin v. the Netherlands, no. 2205/16, §§ 28-32, 19 January 2021 with further references; and contrast Alic v. Croatia (dec.) [Committee], no. 39158/21, 23 May 2023, concerning the newly introduced possibility to seek reopening of criminal proceedings on the basis of the Court's strike-out decisions).
• EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 29920/05

  GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2023 - 32997/15

  29920/05 and 10 others, § 130, 1 July 2014; and Jeronovics v. Latvia [GC], no. 44898/10, §§ 64-70, 5 July 2016), the Court considers that respect for human rights requires it to continue the examination of the case.
• EGMR, 14.01.2021 - 11161/08

  MONT BLANC TRADING LTD AND ANTARES TITANIUM TRADING LTD v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2023 - 32997/15

  Merits 14. The central question in the present case is whether the Croatian authorities' conclusion that the harm suffered by the applicant during military combat in Bosnia and Herzegovina amounted to "injuries" and not "wounding" as required by the Agreement between the two countries in order to be awarded a disability pension in Croatia (see paragraph 4 above), could be considered as arbitrary or manifestly unreasonable (see López Ribalda and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 1874/13 and 8567/13, § 149, 17 October 2019; De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395/09, § 170, 23 February 2017, and Mont Blanc Trading Ltd and Antares Titanium Trading Ltd v. Ukraine, no. 11161/08, § 81, 14 January 2021).

 
• EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 21727/08

  POST v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2023 - 32997/15

  The application is therefore compatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention for the purposes of Article 35 § 3(a) (compare and contrast Post v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 21727/08, 20 January 2009).
• EGMR, 23.02.2017 - 43395/09

  DE TOMMASO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2023 - 32997/15

  Merits 14. The central question in the present case is whether the Croatian authorities' conclusion that the harm suffered by the applicant during military combat in Bosnia and Herzegovina amounted to "injuries" and not "wounding" as required by the Agreement between the two countries in order to be awarded a disability pension in Croatia (see paragraph 4 above), could be considered as arbitrary or manifestly unreasonable (see López Ribalda and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 1874/13 and 8567/13, § 149, 17 October 2019; De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395/09, § 170, 23 February 2017, and Mont Blanc Trading Ltd and Antares Titanium Trading Ltd v. Ukraine, no. 11161/08, § 81, 14 January 2021).
• EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 2205/16

  KESKIN v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2023 - 32997/15

  Accordingly, the procedure for reopening proceedings, the most appropriate way of redressing the violation alleged in the present case, would not be available were the Court to accept the Government's unilateral declaration (compare also Keskin v. the Netherlands, no. 2205/16, §§ 28-32, 19 January 2021 with further references; and contrast Alic v. Croatia (dec.) [Committee], no. 39158/21, 23 May 2023, concerning the newly introduced possibility to seek reopening of criminal proceedings on the basis of the Court's strike-out decisions).
• EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 18064/91

  HIRO BALANI v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.09.2023 - 32997/15

  It is not the Court's task to establish whether the harm suffered by the applicant during military combat amounted to "wounding" within the meaning of the Agreement in order to be awarded a disability pension in Croatia, it being for the national courts to determine questions of that nature (see Hiro Balani v. Spain, 9 December 1994, § 28, Series A no. 303-B).