Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 48499/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,33430) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DOO BROJLER DONJE SINKOVCE v. SERBIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to court) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) Violation ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
DOO Brojler Donje Sinkovce v. Serbia
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.03.2006 - 59532/00
BLECIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 48499/08
In the Court's view, although the Government have not raised an objection as to the Court's competence ratione personae in this respect, the applicant company's victim status nevertheless calls for its consideration (see, mutatis mutandis, Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-III, and Bijelic v. Montenegro and Serbia, no. 11890/05, § 71, 28 April 2009). - EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 45656/99
CATALDO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 48499/08
Only when these conditions are satisfied does the subsidiary nature of the protective mechanism of the Convention preclude examination of an application (see Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, § 71, ECHR 2006-V; and Cataldo v. Italy (dec.), no. 45656/99, ECHR 2004-VII). - EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 1789/07
RASKOVIC v. SERBIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 48499/08
The Court recalls its settled case-law to the effect that the respondent State has consistently been held responsible for its failure to enforce final court judgments establishing the debt of socially-owned companies (see, for example, R. Kacapor and Others, cited above, §§ 97-98; Raskovic and Milunovic v. Serbia, nos. 1789/07 and 28058/07, § 71, 31 May 2011; and Adamovic v. Serbia, cited above, § 39).