Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KARBOWNICZEK v. POLAND

  Art. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Karbowniczek v. Poland

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 22339/08

  The Court observes that the general principles regarding the right "to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial", as guaranteed by Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, were have been stated in a number of its previous judgements (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110 et seq, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 22339/08

  The question whether the purpose of the treatment was to humiliate or debase the victim is a further factor to be taken into account, but the absence of any such purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of Article 3 (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, 6.4.2000, §§ 119-120, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 22339/08

  In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 (see Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 38, Series A no. 336).
• EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89

  KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 22339/08

  The same principle applies to alleged ill-treatment resulting in injury which takes place in the course of an applicant's arrest (see Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, §§ 23-24, Series A no. 269, and Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, §§ 68-78, ECHR 2000-XII).
• EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 29462/95

  REHBOCK c. SLOVENIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 22339/08

  The same principle applies to alleged ill-treatment resulting in injury which takes place in the course of an applicant's arrest (see Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, §§ 23-24, Series A no. 269, and Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, §§ 68-78, ECHR 2000-XII).

• EGMR, 09.06.2015 - 48803/12

  MAJEWICZ v. POLAND

  Simultaneously, the Government declare that they are ready to pay the applicant the sum of EUR 5, 000 which they consider to be reasonable in the light of the Court's case law (see, inter alia, Pradzynski v. Poland, application no. 49284/10, [Committee] decision of 25 March 2014; Majkowski v. Poland, application no. 32272/11, [Committee] decision of 20 November 2012; Karbowniczek v. Poland, application no. 22339/08, judgment of 27 September 2011; Polanowski v. Poland, application no. 16381/05, judgment of 27 April 2010).
• EGMR, 14.09.2015 - 2037/14

  WOLKOWSKI AND JACYNO v. POLAND

  Simultaneously, the Government declare that they are ready to pay the applicants the sum of EUR 15, 000 (EUR 7, 500 for each applicant) which they consider to be reasonable in the light of the Court's case law in similar cases (see, inter alia, Karbowniczek v. Poland, application no. 22339/08, judgment of 27 September 2011; Polanowski v. Poland, application no. 16381/05, judgment of 27 April 2010; Wiktorko v. Poland, application no. 14012/02, judgment of 30 March 2009).