Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 37129/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55336) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DUNYAMALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
Art. 6, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 67208/01
REHÁK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 37129/08
The Court reiterates that an application may be rejected as abusive if it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see, among other authorities, Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey [GC], 16 September 1996, §§ 53-54, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; and Rehák v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 67208/01, 18 May 2004) or if incomplete and therefore misleading information was submitted to the Court (see Hüttner v. Germany (dec.), no. 23130/04, 9 June 2006, Predescu v. Romania, no. 21447/03, § 25, 2 December 2008 and Liuiza v. Lithuania, no. 13472/06, § 52, 31 July 2012). - EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 21447/03
PREDESCU c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 37129/08
The Court reiterates that an application may be rejected as abusive if it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see, among other authorities, Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey [GC], 16 September 1996, §§ 53-54, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; and Rehák v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 67208/01, 18 May 2004) or if incomplete and therefore misleading information was submitted to the Court (see Hüttner v. Germany (dec.), no. 23130/04, 9 June 2006, Predescu v. Romania, no. 21447/03, § 25, 2 December 2008 and Liuiza v. Lithuania, no. 13472/06, § 52, 31 July 2012). - EGMR, 19.06.2006 - 23130/04
Menschenrechtskonvention : Unzulässigkeit der Beschwerde wegen Missbrauchs des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 37129/08
The Court reiterates that an application may be rejected as abusive if it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see, among other authorities, Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey [GC], 16 September 1996, §§ 53-54, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; and Rehák v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 67208/01, 18 May 2004) or if incomplete and therefore misleading information was submitted to the Court (see Hüttner v. Germany (dec.), no. 23130/04, 9 June 2006, Predescu v. Romania, no. 21447/03, § 25, 2 December 2008 and Liuiza v. Lithuania, no. 13472/06, § 52, 31 July 2012). - EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 13472/06
LIUIZA v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 37129/08
The Court reiterates that an application may be rejected as abusive if it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see, among other authorities, Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey [GC], 16 September 1996, §§ 53-54, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; and Rehák v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 67208/01, 18 May 2004) or if incomplete and therefore misleading information was submitted to the Court (see Hüttner v. Germany (dec.), no. 23130/04, 9 June 2006, Predescu v. Romania, no. 21447/03, § 25, 2 December 2008 and Liuiza v. Lithuania, no. 13472/06, § 52, 31 July 2012).