Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TONCIC v. CROATIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  TONCIC v. CROATIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 7, Art. 7 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96

  GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 73553/16

  However, it is not the Court's function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by these courts unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 73553/16

  Although the Court is not bound by the findings of domestic courts, in normal circumstances it requires cogent elements to lead it to depart from the findings of fact reached by those courts (see, for example, Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 150, 20 March 2018).
• EGMR, 17.12.2020 - 73544/14

  MILE NOVAKOVIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 73553/16

  According to its well-established case-law on the matter (see Mile Novakovic v. Croatia, no. 73544/14, §§ 33-34, 17 December 2020, with further references), the Court considers that the applicant's heirs have standing to continue the proceedings in the applicant's stead and rejects the Government's objection in this respect.

 
• EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 58331/09

  GREGACEVIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 73553/16

  Alleged violation of Article 6 of the Convention Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) of the Convention 14. The general principles concerning adequate time for preparation of defence under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) of the Convention have been set out in Gregacevic v. Croatia (no. 58331/09, §§ 49-52, 10 July 2012).
• EGMR, 06.06.2019 - 40429/14

  BOSAK AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 73553/16

  In such circumstances, the Court is satisfied that the domestic courts' decision not to examine the said witnesses, as well as to prohibit the applicant and his lawyer from asking witness A.M. further questions about the merits of the civil proceedings, did not undermine the overall fairness of the proceedings in the present case (compare Bosak and Others v. Croatia, nos. 40429/14 and 3 others, § 117, 6 June 2019, and Gregacevic, cited above, § 64).
• EGMR, 08.04.2014 - 5076/09

  GURDULIC AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 73553/16

  The applicant, who was an attorney at law, represented family G. in civil proceedings concerning several property disputes (for detailed factual information see Gurdulic and Others v. Croatia (dec.), no. 5076/09, §§ 3-30, 8 April 2014).