Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 36813/97 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SCORDINO c. ITALIE (N° 1)
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Exception préliminaire rejetée (non-épuisement des voies de recours internes) Violation de l'art. 6-1 en ce qui concerne la durée de la procédure Violation de l'art. 6-1 en ce qui concerne l'équité de la procédure Violation de P1-1 Dommage matériel - réparation ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SCORDINO v. ITALY (No. 1)
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 6-1 as regard the length of proceedings Violation of Art. 6-1 as regard the fairness of the proceedings Violation of P1-1 Pecuniary damage - financial award Just satisfaction ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 27.03.2003 - 36813/97
- EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 36813/97
- EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 36813/97
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (9)
- EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80
LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 36813/97
Relying on the Court's judgments in The Holy Monasteries v. Greece (judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-A), Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102), and James and Others v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98), the Government submitted that the present case should be examined in the light of the principle that public-interest grounds (such as economic reform or policies designed to promote social justice) could militate in favour of awarding compensation below the full market value. - EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 36813/97
The Court reiterates that interference with the right to respect for possessions must strike a "fair balance" between the demands of the general interest and the requirements of the protection of the individual's fundamental rights (see Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, § 69). - EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 31423/96
PAPACHELAS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 36813/97
Having regard to the margin of appreciation Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 affords national authorities, the Court considers that the price paid to the applicants did not bear a reasonable relation to the value of the expropriated property (see Papachelas v. Greece [GC], no. 31423/96, § 49, ECHR 1999-II, and Platakou v. Greece, no. 38460/97, § 54, ECHR 2001-I).
- EGMR, 11.01.2001 - 38460/97
PLATAKOU v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 36813/97
Having regard to the margin of appreciation Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 affords national authorities, the Court considers that the price paid to the applicants did not bear a reasonable relation to the value of the expropriated property (see Papachelas v. Greece [GC], no. 31423/96, § 49, ECHR 1999-II, and Platakou v. Greece, no. 38460/97, § 54, ECHR 2001-I). - EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 10522/83
Mellacher u.a. ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 36813/97
Accordingly, it is the second sentence of the first paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 which applies in the present case (see Mellacher and Others v. Austria, judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 169, § 42). - EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87
RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 36813/97
The Court reaffirms that while in principle the legislature is not precluded in civil matters from enacting new retrospective provisions to regulate rights arising under existing laws, the principle of the rule of law and the notion of fair trial enshrined in Article 6 preclude any interference by the legislature - other than on compelling grounds of the general interest - with the administration of justice designed to influence the judicial determination of a dispute (see Zielinski and Pradal & Gonzalez and Others v. France [GC], nos. 24846/94 and 34165/96 to 34173/96, § 57, ECHR 1999-VII; Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B; and Papageorgiou v. Greece, judgment of 22 October 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI). - EGMR, 28.10.1999 - 24846/94
ZIELINSKI ET PRADAL & GONZALEZ ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 36813/97
The Court reaffirms that while in principle the legislature is not precluded in civil matters from enacting new retrospective provisions to regulate rights arising under existing laws, the principle of the rule of law and the notion of fair trial enshrined in Article 6 preclude any interference by the legislature - other than on compelling grounds of the general interest - with the administration of justice designed to influence the judicial determination of a dispute (see Zielinski and Pradal & Gonzalez and Others v. France [GC], nos. 24846/94 and 34165/96 to 34173/96, § 57, ECHR 1999-VII; Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B; and Papageorgiou v. Greece, judgment of 22 October 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI). - EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34884/97
BOTTAZZI c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 36813/97
The Court reiterates its finding in four judgments of 28 July 1999 (see, for example, Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, § 22, ECHR 1999-V), that in Italy there is a practice that is incompatible with the Convention resulting from an accumulation of breaches of the "reasonable-time" requirement. - EGMR, 07.11.2000 - 39374/98
ANAGNOSTOPOULOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 36813/97
In the instant case the Court considers that, even though the proceedings were not set aside under Law no. 359/1992, the Law in question did influence the judicial determination of the dispute (see Anagnostopoulos and Others v. Greece, no. 39374/98, § 20-21, ECHR 2000-XI), to which the State was a party.