Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.05.2023 - 21461/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2023,14271) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
RIZZELLI AND FRASSANITI v. ITALY
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 21461/05
- EGMR, 30.05.2023 - 21461/05
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 08.12.2005 - 58858/00
GUISO-GALLISAY v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2023 - 21461/05
The Court has established in a large number of cases against Italy its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account deprivations of property by means of indirect or "constructive" expropriation (see, among many other authorities, Carbonara and Ventura v. Italy, no. 24638/94, §§ 63-73, ECHR 2000-VI; Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy, no. 58858/00, §§ 93-97, 8 December 2005; De Caterina and Others v. Italy, no. 65278/01, §§ 30-34, 28 June 2011; and Messana v. Italy, no. 26128/04, §§ 38-43, 9 February 2017).Having regard to the nature of the admissions contained in the Government's declaration, as well as the amount of compensation proposed, which appears reasonable having regard to the Court's case-law (see Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 58858/00, § 105, 22 December 2009), the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 (c)).
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2023 - 21461/05
To this end, the Court has examined the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; see also WAZA Sp. z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007, and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 28976/05
PREITE c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2023 - 21461/05
As regards compensation based on the application of the "average agricultural value" criterion, the Court established its practice in Preite v. Italy, no. 28976/05, 17 November 2015. - EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 65278/01
DE CATERINA ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2023 - 21461/05
The Court has established in a large number of cases against Italy its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account deprivations of property by means of indirect or "constructive" expropriation (see, among many other authorities, Carbonara and Ventura v. Italy, no. 24638/94, §§ 63-73, ECHR 2000-VI; Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy, no. 58858/00, §§ 93-97, 8 December 2005; De Caterina and Others v. Italy, no. 65278/01, §§ 30-34, 28 June 2011; and Messana v. Italy, no. 26128/04, §§ 38-43, 9 February 2017).