Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 15066/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,61320) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KOVALENKO AND BOYKO v. UKRAINE
Art. 4, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 30.11.2004 - 35091/02
MIKHAÏLENKI ET AUTRES c. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 15066/03
In a situation where the debtor enterprise did not have any effective possibility of recovering the overdue amounts from the State enterprise and accordingly to settle its own debts, it could be considered that the State is indirectly liable for the failure of the debtor enterprise to pay the amounts awarded to the applicants (see Mykhaylenky and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 35091/02 and foll., § 45, ECHR 2004-XII, where the applicants" debtor was a State-owned public enterprise working under a government contract; see by contrast Katsyuk v. Ukraine, no. 58928/00, 5 April 2005). - EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 58928/00
KATSYUK c. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 15066/03
In a situation where the debtor enterprise did not have any effective possibility of recovering the overdue amounts from the State enterprise and accordingly to settle its own debts, it could be considered that the State is indirectly liable for the failure of the debtor enterprise to pay the amounts awarded to the applicants (see Mykhaylenky and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 35091/02 and foll., § 45, ECHR 2004-XII, where the applicants" debtor was a State-owned public enterprise working under a government contract; see by contrast Katsyuk v. Ukraine, no. 58928/00, 5 April 2005).