Auszug aus EGMR - 33509/04

Did the applicant dispose in accordance with Article 13 of effective domestic remedies in order to ensure proper and timely enforcement of the domestic judgments in his favour or to obtain adequate redress for late enforcement (see Lositskiy v. Russia, no. 24395/02, §§ 28-31, 14 December 2006; see also, mutatis mutandis, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 132-160, ECHR 2000-XI)? In particular, was there an effective mechanism, sufficiently established in law and practice, allowing timely payment of adequate compensation for non-pecuniary damage and default interest to the victims of non-enforcement or late enforcement of domestic judgments? Does the possible lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of non-enforcement or late enforcement constitute a systemic problem in the Russian Federation and/or a practice incompatible with the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Bottazzi mentioned above)?.