Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 05.04.1993 - 19066/91 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1993,12760) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
S.S., A.M. AND Y.S.M. v. AUSTRIA
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 13 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
C. AUTRICHE
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 13 MRK
Irrecevable (französisch) - Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte
(englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88
Jens Söring
Auszug aus EKMR, 05.04.1993 - 19066/91
The assessment of this minimum is, in the nature of things, relative and will depend on all the circumstances of the case (see Eur. Court H.R., Soering judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 39, para. 100). - EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76
GUZZARDI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EKMR, 05.04.1993 - 19066/91
In order to determine whether somebody has been "deprived of his liberty" within the meaning of this provision, account must be taken inter alia of the type, duration, effects and manner of implementation of the measure in question (see Eur. Court H.R., Guzzardi judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, p. 33, para. 92). - EKMR, 09.05.1986 - 12102/86
Y-N. et consorts contre la SUISSE
Auszug aus EKMR, 05.04.1993 - 19066/91
However, expulsion may in exceptional circumstances involve a violation of the Convention, for example where there is a serious fear of treatment contrary to Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention in the country to which the person is to be expelled (see No. 12102/86, Dec. 9.5.86, D.R. 47 p. 286 with further references; mutatis mutandis Eur. Court H.R., Soering judgment, loc. cit., p. 32 et seq., para. 81 et seq.). - EKMR, 11.10.1988 - 12474/86
KANTHAK v. the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
Auszug aus EKMR, 05.04.1993 - 19066/91
In particular, the domestic authorities must be in a position to examine the lawfulness and the substantive justification of the matter complained of and to grant appropriate relief (see Eur. Court H.R., Soering judgment, loc. cit. p. 47, para. 120; No. 12474/86, Dec. 11.10.88, D.R. 58 p. 94, at p. 99).
- EKMR, 23.10.1997 - 31176/96
NEUBER v. AUSTRIA
In particular, the domestic authorities must be in a position to examine the lawfulness and the substantive justification of the matter complained of and to grant appropriate relief (No. 19066/91, Dec. 5.4.93, D.R. 74, p. 179 at p. 189).