Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 07.03.1990 - 13669/88 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1990,15357) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
S. v. UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
S. c. ROYAUME-UNI
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Irrecevable (französisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9787/82
WEEKS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 07.03.1990 - 13669/88
In particular, an exercise of discretionary power may be challenged in judicial review proceedings on the grounds that the authority concerned has acted arbitrarily, in bad faith, unreasonably, for an improper purpose or otherwise outside its statutory powers (see, for example, the speech of Lord Diplock in Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service Appeal Cases 374 at 410 and 3 All England Law Reports 935 at 950-951, as quoted in the Weeks judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 114, p. 18, para. 30).
- EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 22112/93
WOTHERSPOON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
As to whether the applicant has exhausted domestic remedies as required by Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention, the Commission recalls that if there exists a mere doubt as to the chances of success or as to the effectiveness of a domestic remedy, Article 26 of the Convention requires that that remedy must be tried (No. 13669/88, Dec. 7.3.90, D.R. 65, p. 245 and No. 10148/82, Dec. 14.3.85, D.R. 42, p. 98).