Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 11.09.1997 - 27894/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,30752) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BÄCKSTRÖM v. FINLAND
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75
LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 11.09.1997 - 27894/95
This provision does not oblige the Contracting States to submit disputes over civil rights to a procedure which at each stage meets the requirements of that provision, provided it eventually may be determined by a body which does (cf., e.g., Eur. Court HR, Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1984, Series A no. 43, pp. 22-23, para. 51). - EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90
VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EKMR, 11.09.1997 - 27894/95
Nor are the Convention organs called upon to examine whether arguments are adequately met (see, e.g., Eur. Court HR, Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no. 288, pp. 19-20, paras. 59-61). - EGMR, 18.02.1991 - 12033/86
FREDIN c. SUÈDE (N° 1)
Auszug aus EKMR, 11.09.1997 - 27894/95
1 (Art. 6-1) (see, e.g., Eur. Court HR, Fredin v. Sweden judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A no. 192, p. 20, para. 63).
- EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12235/86
ZUMTOBEL v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 11.09.1997 - 27894/95
The Supreme Administrative Court did not have to decline jurisdiction on any of the points raised by the applicant and there is no indication that it was unable fully to re-examine the facts (cf. Eur. Court HR, Zumtobel v. Austria judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-A, pp. 19 et seq., paras. 69 et seq.). - EGMR, 24.10.1986 - 9118/80
AGOSI c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 11.09.1997 - 27894/95
In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable procedures (see, e.g., Eur. Court HR, Agosi v. the United Kingdom judgment of 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108, p. 19, para. 55; Hentrich v. France judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 296-A, p. 21, para. 49). - EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 16922/90
FISCHER c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EKMR, 11.09.1997 - 27894/95
1 (Art. 6-1) (see, e.g., Eur. Court HR, Fischer v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 312, p. 17, para. 28). - EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 13616/88
HENTRICH v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 11.09.1997 - 27894/95
In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable procedures (see, e.g., Eur. Court HR, Agosi v. the United Kingdom judgment of 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108, p. 19, para. 55; Hentrich v. France judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 296-A, p. 21, para. 49).