Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 12.05.1988 - 11071/84 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1988,17777) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
RADETZKY v. AUTRICHE
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 25.02.1982 - 7511/76
CAMPBELL ET COSANS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.05.1988 - 11071/84
The reservation also applies to those laws which - although they were enacted after the reservation - do not result in an extension of the scope of substantive law intended to be covered by the reservation (cf. Constitutional Court decisions Nos.8234/1978 and 8428/1978, Eur. Court H.R. Campbell and Cosans judgment of 25 February 1982, Series A no. 48, p. 17 para. 37b). - EKMR, 04.03.1987 - 9675/82
FREIE RUNDFUNK AG i Gr v. THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.05.1988 - 11071/84
It follows that the applicant has not shown that a complaint to the Constitutional Court on the ground of an alleged violation of his constitutional rights under Article 5 of the Convention would have been an ineffective remedy (cf. mutatis mutandis No. 712/60, Dec. 16.12.61, Retimag AG v. Federal Republic of Germany, Collection 8 pp. 29, 41 = Yearbook 4 pp. 384, 406, and No. 9675/82, Freie Rundfunk AG i. Gr. v. Federal Republic of Germany, Dec. 4.3.87, para. 5 of The Law, to be published in D.R.). - EKMR, 16.12.1961 - 712/60
RETIMAG S.A. contre la REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.05.1988 - 11071/84
It follows that the applicant has not shown that a complaint to the Constitutional Court on the ground of an alleged violation of his constitutional rights under Article 5 of the Convention would have been an ineffective remedy (cf. mutatis mutandis No. 712/60, Dec. 16.12.61, Retimag AG v. Federal Republic of Germany, Collection 8 pp. 29, 41 = Yearbook 4 pp. 384, 406, and No. 9675/82, Freie Rundfunk AG i. Gr. v. Federal Republic of Germany, Dec. 4.3.87, para. 5 of The Law, to be published in D.R.). - EKMR, 07.04.1967 - 2432/65
X. v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.05.1988 - 11071/84
The Commission itself has only accepted such subsequent legislation as being covered by the Austrian reservation which, in substance, replaced legislation existing already at the date of the ratification of the Convention by Austria (cf. No. 1047/81, Dec. 15.12.61, YB 4 p. 356; No. 1731/62, Dec. 16.12.64, YB 7 p. 192; No. 1138/61, Dec. 18.6.63, Coll. 11 p. 9; No. 2432/65, Dec. 7.4.67, Coll. 22 p. 124). - EKMR, 16.12.1964 - 1731/62
X. contre l'AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EKMR, 12.05.1988 - 11071/84
The Commission itself has only accepted such subsequent legislation as being covered by the Austrian reservation which, in substance, replaced legislation existing already at the date of the ratification of the Convention by Austria (cf. No. 1047/81, Dec. 15.12.61, YB 4 p. 356; No. 1731/62, Dec. 16.12.64, YB 7 p. 192; No. 1138/61, Dec. 18.6.63, Coll. 11 p. 9; No. 2432/65, Dec. 7.4.67, Coll. 22 p. 124).