Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 14.07.1983 - 9661/82 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1983,10507) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
B. c. AUTRICHE
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
B. v. AUSTRIA
Wird zitiert von ... (4)
- EKMR, 23.10.1995 - 20602/92
SZÜCS v. AUSTRIA
They point out that the Commission, in the case of Bach v. Austria (No. 9661/82, Dec. 14.7.83, D.R. 34 p. 127) did not apply Article 6 (Art. 6) to proceedings under the Criminal Proceedings Compensation Act, finding that the claim is not comparable to claims under the Law on Damages, as is does not require a punishable conduct by a civil servant or a violation of the law at all. - EKMR, 30.11.1994 - 20365/92
ALKIN v. AUSTRIA
They point out that the Commission, in the case of Bach v. Austria (No. 9661/82, Dec. 14.7.83, D.R. 34, p. 127) did not apply Article 6 (Art. 6) to proceedings under the Criminal Proceedings Compensation Act, finding that the claim is not comparable to claims under the Law of Damages, as is does not require a punishable conduct by a civil servant or a violation of the law at all. - EKMR, 18.10.1995 - 22034/93
A.M., A.N. AND T.F. v. AUSTRIA
As regards the applicability of Article 6 (Art. 6), the Government submit that the contested proceedings concern a public-law claim, which is not comparable to claims under the law of damages, as it is neither dependent on the misconduct of a public servant nor on any other violation of the law (B. v. Austria No. 9661/82, Dec. 14.7.83, D.R. 34 p. 127). - EKMR, 12.04.1991 - 13876/88
DE JONG v. THE NETHERLANDS
1 (Art. 6-1) (Eur. Court H.R., Neumeister judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 8, p. 43, para. 23; No. 9661/82, Dec. 14.7.83, D.R. 34 p. 127).