Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 33770/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,30494) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PARUSZEWSKA v. POLAND
Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 14 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80
LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 33770/96
Article 6 (Art. 6) does not in itself guarantee any particular content for "rights and obligations" in the substantive law of the Contracting States (cf. Eur. Court HR, James and others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98, p. 46, para. 81, and Lithgow and others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, p. 70, para. 192). - EGMR, 23.11.1983 - 8919/80
VAN DER MUSSELE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 33770/96
The Commission further recalls that "possessions" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1) may be either "existing possessions" (Eur. Court HR, Van der Mussele v. Belgium judgment of 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 23, para. 48) or claims, in respect of which the applicant can argue that he has at least a "legitimate expectation" of obtaining effective enjoyment of a property right (Eur. Court HR, Pine Valley Developments v. Ireland judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 23, para. 51; Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. v. Belgium judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332, p. 21, para. 31). - EGMR, 23.10.1985 - 8848/80
BENTHEM v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 33770/96
The dispute which gives a right to a determination by a court must be "genuine and of a serious nature" (see Eur. Court HR, Benthem v. the Netherlands judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97, p. 14, para. 32).
- EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12742/87
PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ET AUTRES c. IRLANDE
Auszug aus EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 33770/96
The Commission further recalls that "possessions" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1) may be either "existing possessions" (Eur. Court HR, Van der Mussele v. Belgium judgment of 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 23, para. 48) or claims, in respect of which the applicant can argue that he has at least a "legitimate expectation" of obtaining effective enjoyment of a property right (Eur. Court HR, Pine Valley Developments v. Ireland judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 23, para. 51; Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. v. Belgium judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332, p. 21, para. 31). - EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91
PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 33770/96
The Commission further recalls that "possessions" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1) may be either "existing possessions" (Eur. Court HR, Van der Mussele v. Belgium judgment of 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 23, para. 48) or claims, in respect of which the applicant can argue that he has at least a "legitimate expectation" of obtaining effective enjoyment of a property right (Eur. Court HR, Pine Valley Developments v. Ireland judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 23, para. 51; Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. v. Belgium judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332, p. 21, para. 31). - EGMR, 24.08.1993 - 14399/88
MASSA v. ITALY
Auszug aus EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 33770/96
Court HR, Massa v. Italy judgment of 4 August 1993, Series A no. 265-B, p. 20, para.