Webinar: Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten am Mi. den 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 Uhr Unverbindlich anmelden
×
×
Doctrine-WebinarNicht verpassen
Kostenloses Webinar zum neuen KI-Assistenten am Mi. den 14. Oktober 2026 11:30 - 12:00 Uhr
Unverbindlich anmelden

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 10386/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2010,60558
EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 10386/03 (https://dejure.org/2010,60558)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 16.03.2010 - 10386/03 (https://dejure.org/2010,60558)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 16. März 2010 - 10386/03 (https://dejure.org/2010,60558)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,60558) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (13)Zitiert selbst (2)

  • EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 24342/04

    ZUNIC v. SLOVENIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 10386/03
    For relevant domestic law see the Court's decision Žunic v. Slovenia (no. 24342/04, 18 October 2007).
  • EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 76512/01

    BALTIC v. SLOVENIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 10386/03
    Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Baltic v. Slovenia, no. 76512/01, 9 March 2006) the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings can still be considered reasonable.
  • EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 49914/06

    VUKOVIC v. SLOVENIA

    For relevant domestic law see decision Žurej v. Slovenia (no. 10386/03, §§ 14-15, 26 March 2010).

    The Court notes that the applicant failed to avail himself of the acceleratory remedies before the Supreme Court in order to speed up the proceedings nor did he lodge a just satisfaction claim for which he in any event failed to satisfy the conditions (see Žurej v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 10386/03, 16 March 2010, §§ 17-19).

  • EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 50485/06

    BLAKCORI v. SLOVENIA

    For relevant domestic law see decision Žurej v. Slovenia (no. 10386/03, §§ 14-15, 26 March 2010).

    The Court further notes that the applicant failed to avail himself of the acceleratory remedies in order to speed up the proceedings and therefore failed to satisfy the conditions for the just satisfaction claim (see Žurej v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 10386/03, 16 March 2010, §§ 17-19 and Nezirovic v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 16400/06, §§ 27- 41, 18 November 2008).

  • EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 38980/05

    STRAUS v. SLOVENIA

    For relevant domestic law see decision Žurej v. Slovenia (no. 10386/03, §§ 14-15, 26 March 2010).

    The Court further notes that the applicant failed to avail herself of the acceleratory remedies in order to speed up the proceedings nor did she lodge a just satisfaction claim for which she in any event failed to satisfy the conditions (see Nezirovic v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 16400/06, §§ 27-41, 18 November 2008 and Žurej v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 10386/03, 16 March 2010, §§ 17-19).

  • EGMR, 19.07.2012 - 48163/08

    [ENG]

    For a more detailed presentation of the relevant domestic law see Žunic v. Slovenia, (dec.) no. 24342/04, §§ 16-26, 18 October 2007, and Žurej v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 10386/03, 16 march 2010.
  • EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 53723/13

    ZAVODNIK v. SLOVENIA

    For a detailed presentation of the Act on the Protection of the Right to a Trial without Undue Delay ("the 2006 Act"), see Zunic v. Slovenia (dec.) (no. 24342/04, §§ 16-26, 18 October 2007), and Zurej v. Slovenia (dec.) (no. 10386/03, 16 March 2010).
  • EGMR, 24.10.2013 - 9842/07

    [ENG]

    For a more detailed presentation of the relevant domestic law see Žunic v. Slovenia, (dec.) no. 24342/04, §§ 16-26, 18 October 2007, and Žurej v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 10386/03, 16 March 2010.
  • EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 42224/04

    PODBELSEK BRACIC v. SLOVENIA

    Having regard to the 2006 Act as in force at the material time (see by contrast, Žurej v. Slovenia, (dec.), no. 10386/03, 16 March 2010, § 17), the applicant had no possibility to claim compensation for the delays incurred in the proceedings (see mutatis mutandis, Tomazic v. Slovenia, no. 38350/02, 13 December 2007, §§ 41-45 and Lesjak v. Slovenia (no. 33946/03, 21 July 2009, §§ 54-55).
  • EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 52195/12

    NOVAK v. SLOVENIA

    For a detailed presentation of the 2006 Act, see Žunič v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 24342/04, §§ 16-26, 18 October 2007, and Žurej v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 10386/03, §§ 14-15, 16 March 2010.
  • EGMR, 21.11.2017 - 66433/13

    DRUSTVO ZA VARSTVO UPNIKOV v. SLOVENIA

    For a detailed presentation of the 2006 Act, see, inter alia, Žunič v. Slovenia, (dec.) no. 24342/04, §§ 16-26, 18 October 2007, and Žurej v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 10386/03, §§ 14-15, 16 March 2010.
  • EGMR, 10.10.2013 - 10017/10

    BELTRAM AND BELTRAM CEROVSEK v. SLOVENIA

    For relevant domestic law see Žunic v. Slovenia, (dec.) no. 24342/04, §§ 16-26, 18 October 2007, and Žurej v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 10386/03, 16 March 2010.
  • EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 42977/04

    FORTUNAT v. SLOVENIA

  • EGMR, 03.01.2013 - 24162/06

    KOVINAR D.O.O. v. SLOVENIA

  • EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 29119/06

    MEGLIC v. SLOVENIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht