Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 02.03.1987 - 11244/84 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1987,12640) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PIROTTE v. BELGIUM
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PIROTTE contre la Belgique
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3 MRK
irrecevable (französisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (7)
- EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 51588/08
DALIPI c. GRECE
En tout état de cause, à supposer même que la Cour de cassation ait pu ex officio se poser la question de sa propre composition, cela ne décharge pas le requérant de son obligation d'avoir lui-même articulé devant la juridiction compétente le grief formulé devant la Cour (voir Pirotte c. Belgique (déc.), no 11244/84, 2 mars 1987 ; Ahmet Sadık c. Grèce, 15 novembre 1996, § 33, Recueil 1996-V). - EKMR, 02.07.1996 - 21444/93
ÖHLINGER v. AUSTRIA
The Commission recalls however, that the fact that a domestic court is competent to examine proprio motu grounds amounting to a violation of the Convention does not absolve the applicant from the obligation of raising the complaint before the court himself (see No. 11244/84, Dec. 2.3.87, D.R. 55, p. 98). - EKMR, 20.10.1997 - 29764/96
IMAM AND OTHERS v. GREECE
Moreover, according to the case-law of the Commission and the Court, the fact that a domestic court is competent to examine proprio motu grounds amounting to a violation of the Convention does not absolve the applicant from the obligation of raising the complaint before the court himself (No. 11244/84, Dec. 2.3.87, D.R. 55, p. 98; Eur. Court HR, Ahmet Sadik v. Greece judgment of 15 November 1996, to be published in Reports 1996, para. 33).
- EKMR, 20.10.1997 - 31117/96
AGKO v. GREECE
Moreover, according to the case-law of the Commission and the Court, the fact that a domestic court of appeal is competent to examine proprio motu grounds amounting to a violation of the Convention does not absolve the applicant from the obligation of raising the complaint before the court himself (No. 11244/84, Dec. 2.3.87, D.R. 55, p. 98; Eur. Court HR, Ahmet Sadik v. Greece judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, No. 20, para. 33). - EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 20774/92
HOOS v. THE NETHERLANDS
The Commission, however, does not find that an applicant is absolved from the obligation to exhaust domestic remedies whenever a domestic authority should act ex officio (cf. No.11244/84, Dec. 2.3.87, D.R. 55 p. 98). - EKMR, 11.05.1992 - 15243/89
A. v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EKMR, 29.06.1992 - 14852/89
AKHTAR, JOHANGIR AND JOHANGIR v. THE NETHERLANDS
In this respect the Commission refers to its established case-law (cf. No. 10307/83, Dec. 6.3.84, D.R. 37, pp. 113, 120; No. 11244/84, Dec. 2.3.87, D.R. 55, pp. 98, 104).