Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  A. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. a, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EKMR, 15.07.1986 - 9938/82

  BRICMONT v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 11.05.1992 - 15243/89

  It is normally for the national courts to decide whether it is necessary or advisable to call a witness (cf. No. 10563/83, Dec. 5.7.85, D.R. 44 p. 113 and Eur. Court H.R., Bricmont judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, para. 89).
• EKMR, 13.12.1979 - 7987/77

  COMPANY X. v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 11.05.1992 - 15243/89

  The Commission refers, on this point, to its established case-law (see e.g. No. 458/59, Dec. 29.3.60, Yearbook 3 pp. 222, 236; No. 5258/71, Dec. 8.2.73, Collection 43 pp. 71, 77; No. 7987/77, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45).
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 10857/84

  BRICMONT v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 11.05.1992 - 15243/89

  In addition, because of the logical link between paragraphs 3 (a) and 3 (b) of Article 6 (Art. 6-3-a, 6-3-b), the information about the nature and cause of the accusation must be adequate to enable the accused to prepare his defence accordingly (cf. No. 10857/84, Dec. 15.7.86, D.R. 48 p. 106).

 
• EGMR, 26.05.1988 - 10563/83

  EKBATANI v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EKMR, 11.05.1992 - 15243/89

  It is normally for the national courts to decide whether it is necessary or advisable to call a witness (cf. No. 10563/83, Dec. 5.7.85, D.R. 44 p. 113 and Eur. Court H.R., Bricmont judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, para. 89).
• EKMR, 08.02.1973 - 5258/71

  X. v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EKMR, 11.05.1992 - 15243/89

  The Commission refers, on this point, to its established case-law (see e.g. No. 458/59, Dec. 29.3.60, Yearbook 3 pp. 222, 236; No. 5258/71, Dec. 8.2.73, Collection 43 pp. 71, 77; No. 7987/77, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45).
• EKMR, 02.03.1987 - 11244/84

  PIROTTE v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 11.05.1992 - 15243/89

  In this respect the Commission refers to its established case-law (cf. No. 5574/72, Dec. 21.3.75, D.R. 3 p. 10; No. 10307/83, Dec. 6.3.84, D.R. 37 p. 113; No. 11244/84, Dec. 2.3.87, D.R. 55 p. 98).
• EKMR, 06.03.1984 - 10307/83

  M. v. the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY

  Auszug aus EKMR, 11.05.1992 - 15243/89

  In this respect the Commission refers to its established case-law (cf. No. 5574/72, Dec. 21.3.75, D.R. 3 p. 10; No. 10307/83, Dec. 6.3.84, D.R. 37 p. 113; No. 11244/84, Dec. 2.3.87, D.R. 55 p. 98).
• EKMR, 21.03.1975 - 5574/72

  X. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 11.05.1992 - 15243/89

  In this respect the Commission refers to its established case-law (cf. No. 5574/72, Dec. 21.3.75, D.R. 3 p. 10; No. 10307/83, Dec. 6.3.84, D.R. 37 p. 113; No. 11244/84, Dec. 2.3.87, D.R. 55 p. 98).