Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 53715/19, 58980/19, 11687/21, 11689/21 |
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BOGDANOV v. RUSSIA and 3 other applications
Art. 3 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 12.06.2025 - 11687/21
KHUBIYEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 53715/19
78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 77-93, 19 January 2021) and lack of an effective remedy in this respect (application no. 11687/21).QUESTION SPECIFIC TO THE APPLICATION No. 11687/21.
As regards the application no. 11687/21, did the applicant have effective domestic remedies in respect of the above complaint about handcuffing, as guaranteed by Article 13 of the Convention?.
11687/21.
- EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 78638/11
SHLYKOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 53715/19
78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 77-93, 19 January 2021) and lack of an effective remedy in this respect (application no. 11687/21).78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 49-56, 19 January 2021; and Akhmednabiyev v Russia (dec.), no. 39410/11, §§ 27-29, 23 March 2021)?.
Did the systematic application of handcuffs to applicants in all cases constitute inhuman or degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention (see N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, §§ 53-56, 2 June 2020 and Shlykov and Others v. Russia, nos. 78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 77-93, 19 January 2021)? The Government are invited to indicate periods when the applicants were subjected to the above measures and to provide supporting documents relating to the application of these measures.
- EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 14727/11
N.T. v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 53715/19
The cases concern routine application of handcuffs to life prisoners in breach of domestic legal provisions every time they left their cells (see Kashavelov v. Bulgaria, no. 891/05, §§ 39 and 40, 20 January 2011, Kaverzin v. Ukraine, no. 23893/03, §§ 151-63, 15 May 2012, N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, §§ 53-56, 2 June 2020, and Shlykov and Others v. Russia, nos.Did the systematic application of handcuffs to applicants in all cases constitute inhuman or degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention (see N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, §§ 53-56, 2 June 2020 and Shlykov and Others v. Russia, nos. 78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 77-93, 19 January 2021)? The Government are invited to indicate periods when the applicants were subjected to the above measures and to provide supporting documents relating to the application of these measures.
- EGMR, 05.02.2026 - 41743/17
SHMELEV v. RUSSIA and 10 other applications
Auszug aus EGMR - 53715/19
In particular, can the provisions of the Code of Administrative Procedure (the CAP), as seen in the light of the judicial practice and clarifications issued by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, provide an effective preventive and/or compensatory remedy that would satisfy the requirements as outlined in the Court's practice (see, notably, Shmelev and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 41743/17, §§ 87 and 89, 17 March 2020; Shlykov and Others v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 23.03.2021 - 39410/11
AKHMEDNABIYEV v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications
Auszug aus EGMR - 53715/19
78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 49-56, 19 January 2021; and Akhmednabiyev v Russia (dec.), no. 39410/11, §§ 27-29, 23 March 2021)?.
- EGMR, 16.01.2025 - 1058/17
PULYALIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
53715/19.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.06.2025 - 11687/21 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KHUBIYEV v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTER OF LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2025 - 11687/21
Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties, and its findings above, the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal question raised by the applicant (see above) and that there is no need to examine this complaint (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, and Ionov and Klimenko v. Russia [Committee], nos. 9289/15 and 33932/17, § 11, 30 March 2023). - EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 15018/11
HARAKCHIEV AND TOLUMOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2025 - 11687/21
15018/11 and 61199/12, § 199, ECHR 2014 (extracts)). - EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 78638/11
SHLYKOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2025 - 11687/21
78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 72-76, 19 January 2021, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
- EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 14727/11
N.T. v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2025 - 11687/21
Rn. 9 In the leading cases of N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, §§ 53-56, 2 June 2020, and Shlykov and Others v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 30.03.2023 - 9289/15
IONOV AND KLIMENKO v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2025 - 11687/21
Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties, and its findings above, the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal question raised by the applicant (see above) and that there is no need to examine this complaint (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, and Ionov and Klimenko v. Russia [Committee], nos. 9289/15 and 33932/17, § 11, 30 March 2023). - EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 42771/19
YEMANOV v. RUSSIA and22 other applications
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2025 - 11687/21
Rn. 13 Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, N.T., cited above, §§ 59-61, and Shlykov and Others, cited above, § 111), as well as taking into account the previous award made by the Court to the applicant (see Yemanov and Others v. Russia [Committee], 42771/19 and 22 other applications, § 12, 15 February 2024), the Court considers that the finding of a violation in this case will constitute in itself sufficient just satisfaction.
- EGMR - 53715/19 (anhängig)
BOGDANOV v. RUSSIA and 3 other applications
78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 77-93, 19 January 2021) and lack of an effective remedy in this respect (application no. 11687/21).QUESTION SPECIFIC TO THE APPLICATION No. 11687/21.
As regards the application no. 11687/21, did the applicant have effective domestic remedies in respect of the above complaint about handcuffing, as guaranteed by Article 13 of the Convention?.
11687/21.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".