Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  N.T. v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - General measures);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  N.T. v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (13)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

  Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 14727/11

  However, with a view to helping the respondent State to fulfil that obligation, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, §§ 158-59, ECHR 2014; Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, §§ 254-55, ECHR 2012; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 148, 17 September 2009; and Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V).
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 14727/11

  However, with a view to helping the respondent State to fulfil that obligation, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, §§ 158-59, ECHR 2014; Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, §§ 254-55, ECHR 2012; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 148, 17 September 2009; and Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V).
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  STANEV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 14727/11

  However, with a view to helping the respondent State to fulfil that obligation, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, §§ 158-59, ECHR 2014; Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, §§ 254-55, ECHR 2012; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 148, 17 September 2009; and Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V).

 
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 14727/11

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, for example, Mursic v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, § 96, 20 October 2016; Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 113, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 11138/10

  Transnistrien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 14727/11

  The State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject him or her to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his or her health and well-being are adequately secured (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 92-94, ECHR 2000-XI; Mursic, cited above, § 99; Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 11138/10, § 178, ECHR 2016; and Svinarenko and Slyadnev, cited above, § 116).
• EGMR - 43441/08 (anhängig)

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 14727/11

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, for example, Mursic v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, § 96, 20 October 2016; Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 113, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).

• EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 28355/18

  ZAVGORODNIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  In the leading case of N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, 2 June 2020, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
• EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 42771/19

  YEMANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  In the leading case of N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, 2 June 2020, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
• EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 45302/19

  BURTSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  32541/08 and 43441/08, §§ 113-39, ECHR 2014 (extracts), concerning placement in a metal cage in a courtroom during criminal proceedings; N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, 2 June 2020, concerning inadequate conditions of lifers' detention under strict imprisonment regime and routine handcuffing; Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-08 and 154-58, 22 May 2012, and Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos.

 
• EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 38217/19

  MELNIK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, 22 May 2012, and Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 92-156, 9 April 2019, concerning conditions of detention during transport and lack of an effective remedy in that respect, N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, §§ 32-57, 2 June 2020, regarding inadequate conditions of detention of prisoners serving a life sentence, Gorlov and Others, cited above, relevant to the lack of an effective remedy in respect of the permanent video surveillance of detainees; and Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia, nos. 11157/04 and 15162/05, 4 July 2013, concerning prisoners' right to vote).
• EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 13050/17

  RUDIK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  In the leading case of N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, 2 June 2020, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
• EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 21514/18

  ZATYNAYKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 92-156, 9 April 2019, concerning inadequate conditions of transport and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect; N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, §§ 53-56, 2 June 2020, concerning routine handcuffing of prisoners serving a life sentence, Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no. 21272/03, 2 November 2010, concerning effectiveness of legal assistance in appeal proceedings in a criminal case; and Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 3501/20

  SCHMIDT AND SMIGOL v. ESTONIA

  In that connection, the Court has often observed that short periods of outdoor exercise exacerbate the situation of prisoners who are confined to their cells for the rest of the time (see N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, § 49, 2 June 2020, and the cases cited therein).
• EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 10881/21

  SOLDATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, §§ 32-57, 2 June 2020, concerning inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime; Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-08, 22 May 2012, and Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 41090/18

  RESIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012, concerning inadequate conditions of detention in a remand prison; N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, §§ 42-52, 2 June 2020, concerning inadequate conditions of lifers' detention under strict imprisonment regime; Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-08 and 154-58, 22 May 2012, and Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 48796/18

  SAFRONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  In the leading case of N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, 2 June 2020, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
• EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 55659/14

  RUDYKH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 26363/18

  ZVEREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 57636/16

  DILSHNAYDER AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA