Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ZVEREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 13+8-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life ...

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• BFH, 27.01.2004 - IV S 16/03

  Gegenvorstellung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 26363/18

  3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - Inadequate conditions of transportation in van and train on 25/05/2019, 07-08/03/2020, 16-17/03/2022 (0,3 - 0, 35 sq. m. per inmate, overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light).
• EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03

  IDALOV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 26363/18

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-08, 22 May 2012, and Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 92-156, 9 April 2019, concerning conditions of detention during transport and lack of an effective remedy in that respect; and N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, §§ 53-56, 2 June 2020, concerning routine handcuffing of prisoners serving a life sentence).
• EGMR, 09.04.2019 - 18255/10

  TOMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 26363/18

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-08, 22 May 2012, and Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 92-156, 9 April 2019, concerning conditions of detention during transport and lack of an effective remedy in that respect; and N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, §§ 53-56, 2 June 2020, concerning routine handcuffing of prisoners serving a life sentence).

 
• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 11/05

  GÜRBÜZ AND ÖZÇELIK v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 26363/18

  11/05/2018.
• EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 27057/06

  GORLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 26363/18

  The Court has already established, in an earlier case against Russia, that the national legal framework governing the placement of detainees under permanent video surveillance in penal institutions falls short of the standards set out in Article 8 of the Convention (see Gorlov and Others v. Russia (nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019).
• EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 78638/11

  SHLYKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 26363/18

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case law (see, in particular, Gorlov and Others, cited above, with further references, § 120, and Shlykov and Others v. Russia, nos. 78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 109-11, 19 January 2021, which imposed on the respondent State a legal obligation, under Article 46 of the Convention, to implement, under the supervision of the Committee of Ministers, such measures as they consider appropriate to secure the right of the applicants and other persons in their position), the Court considers that the finding of a violation in respect of the complaints concerning the permanent video surveillance of detainees in post-conviction detention facilities and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect constitutes a sufficient just satisfaction in the present case.
• EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 14727/11

  N.T. v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 26363/18

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-08, 22 May 2012, and Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 92-156, 9 April 2019, concerning conditions of detention during transport and lack of an effective remedy in that respect; and N.T. v. Russia, no. 14727/11, §§ 53-56, 2 June 2020, concerning routine handcuffing of prisoners serving a life sentence).
• EGMR, 04.06.2020 - 44363/14

  IVANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 26363/18

  As to the other complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention lodged by Mr Nemtsev (application no. 32904/19, see the appended table) about inhumane conditions of transport and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect, having taken into account the previous awards made to the applicant in earlier cases (see, in particular, Nemtsev and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 22722/14 and 6 others, 29 March 2018; and Gusev and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 28348/13 and 5 others, 4 May 2017), the Court also considers it reasonable not to make any award to the applicant in the present case (compare Ivanov and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 44363/14 and 2 others, §§ 11-13, 4 June 2020).
• EGMR, 29.03.2018 - 22722/14

  NEMTSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 26363/18

  As to the other complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention lodged by Mr Nemtsev (application no. 32904/19, see the appended table) about inhumane conditions of transport and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect, having taken into account the previous awards made to the applicant in earlier cases (see, in particular, Nemtsev and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 22722/14 and 6 others, 29 March 2018; and Gusev and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 28348/13 and 5 others, 4 May 2017), the Court also considers it reasonable not to make any award to the applicant in the present case (compare Ivanov and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 44363/14 and 2 others, §§ 11-13, 4 June 2020).
• EGMR, 04.05.2017 - 28348/13

  GUSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 26363/18

  As to the other complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention lodged by Mr Nemtsev (application no. 32904/19, see the appended table) about inhumane conditions of transport and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect, having taken into account the previous awards made to the applicant in earlier cases (see, in particular, Nemtsev and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 22722/14 and 6 others, 29 March 2018; and Gusev and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 28348/13 and 5 others, 4 May 2017), the Court also considers it reasonable not to make any award to the applicant in the present case (compare Ivanov and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 44363/14 and 2 others, §§ 11-13, 4 June 2020).

• EGMR, 10.11.2022 - 12283/14

  KRUGLOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  14988/09 and 50 others, §§ 27-29, 27 November 2018, constitutes sufficient just satisfaction (see, for a similar approach, Alekseyev and Others v. Russia ([Committee], nos. 26624/15 and 76 others, § 18, 16January 2020), Zverev and Others v. Russia ([Committee], nos. 26363/18 and 2 others, § 15, 7 July 2022, and Taratunin and Others v. Russia ([Committee], nos. 2051/18 and 4 others, § 14, 28 July 2022).