Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ERIKSSON and Others v. SWEDEN

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 6, Art. 13 MRK
  inadmissible (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ERIKSSON c. SUEDE

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 6, Art. 13 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (8)Zitiert selbst (3)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EKMR, 13.12.1979 - 7987/77

  COMPANY X. v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 29.02.1988 - 11844/85

  71, 77; No. 7987/77, Dec.
• EKMR, 08.02.1973 - 5258/71

  X. v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EKMR, 29.02.1988 - 11844/85

  5258/71, Dec.
• EKMR, 07.12.1983 - 10378/83

  K. c. DANEMARK

  Auszug aus EKMR, 29.02.1988 - 11844/85

  e.g. No. 10378/83,.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EKMR, 01.07.1992 - 13903/88

  CLAESSON AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN

  In the present case, the final decision for the purposes of this Article must, in accordance with what has been stated above, be the Board's decision in 1973 to introduce this prohibition (see, inter alia, No. 11844/85, Dec. 29.2.88, D.R. 55 p. 205; No. 9303/81, Dec. 13.10.86, D.R. 49 p. 44).

  No. 11844/85, Dec.

• EGMR, 14.11.2002 - 59879/00

  BERKMANN v. AUSTRIA

  However, Article 6 is not applicable to proceedings for the amendment of a zoning plan if the person concerned has no right under domestic law to such an amendment and, thus, no civil right is in issue (no. 11844/85, Dec. 29.2.88, D.R. 55 p. 205).
• EKMR, 16.10.1995 - 16970/90

  ALLAN JACOBSSON v. SWEDEN

  11844/85, Dec.

• EGMR, 08.02.2000 - 29268/95

  ENZI v. AUSTRIA

  However, Article 6 is not applicable to proceedings for the amendment of a zoning plan if the person concerned has no right under domestic law to such an amendment and, thus, no civil right is in issue (No. 11844/85, Dec. 29.2.88, D.R. 55 p. 205).
• EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 26794/95

  SCHERTLER v. AUSTRIA

  No. 11844/85,.
• EKMR, 26.06.1996 - 26575/95

  SCHERTLER v. AUSTRIA

  No. 11844/85, Dec.
• EKMR, 06.03.1989 - 12337/86

  RANTNER v. AUSTRIA

  mutatis mutandis No. 11844/85,.
• EGMR, 12.12.2002 - 63413/00

  HAIDER v. AUSTRIA

  The Court reiterates that Article 6 of the Convention is not applicable to proceedings for the amendment of a zoning plan if the person concerned has no right under domestic law to such an amendment and if, thus, no civil right is in issue (11844/85, Dec. 29.2.88, D.R. 55 p. 205, Enzi v. Austria, (Dec.), no. 29268/95, 8.2.2000).