Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KONDRULIN v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 34 - Individual applications;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 12987/15

  The Court has found that the next-of-kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 97, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 44009/05

  SHTUKATUROV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 12987/15

  The interim measure in the present case was therefore also meant to ensure that the applicant could effectively pursue his case before the Court (see Amirov, cited above, § 70, and Shtukaturov v. Russia, no. 44009/05, § 141, ECHR 2008).
• EGMR, 08.04.2014 - 73359/10

  ERGEZEN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 12987/15

  Whether the rights at issue are transferable to an heir willing to pursue an application on behalf of a deceased person is not therefore a decisive factor (see Fartushin v. Russia, no. 38887/09, §§ 31-34, 8 October 2015 and Ergezen v. Turkey, no. 73359/10, § 29, 8 April 2014).
• EGMR, 24.03.2015 - 2959/11

  ASSOCIATION FOR THE DEFENCE OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN ROMANIA - HELSINKI COMMITTEE ON …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 12987/15

  The Court considered that to find otherwise would amount to preventing such serious allegations of a violation of the Convention from being examined at an international level, with the risk that a respondent State might escape accountability under the Convention (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu, cited above, § 112, and Association for the Defence of Human Rights in Romania - Helsinki Committee on behalf of Ionel Garcea v. Romania, no. 2959/11, § 42, 24 March 2015).
• EGMR, 08.10.2015 - 38887/09

  FARTUSHIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 12987/15

  Whether the rights at issue are transferable to an heir willing to pursue an application on behalf of a deceased person is not therefore a decisive factor (see Fartushin v. Russia, no. 38887/09, §§ 31-34, 8 October 2015 and Ergezen v. Turkey, no. 73359/10, § 29, 8 April 2014).

• EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 4312/13

  TARRICONE c. ITALIE

  Toutefois, eu égard à la vulnérabilité des personnes placées en détention, une fois que le requérant a fourni un commencement de preuve d'un traitement relevant du champ d'application de l'article 3 de la Convention, c'est au Gouvernement qu'il incombe d'apporter des éléments crédibles et convaincants pour démontrer que le requérant a reçu des soins médicaux complets et appropriés en détention (Kondrulin c. Russie, no 12987/15, §§ 56-57, 20 septembre 2016, et Wenner, précité, § 58).
• EGMR, 04.06.2020 - 15343/15

  ASSOCIATION INNOCENCE EN DANGER ET ASSOCIATION ENFANCE ET PARTAGE c. FRANCE

  La question qui se pose dès lors est celle de savoir si l'on peut considérer que des « circonstances exceptionnelles'justifient que la Cour admette la qualité pour agir des associations requérantes en tant que représentantes de l'enfant même en l'absence de procuration et alors même que celle-ci est décédée avant l'introduction des requêtes (ibidem, § 51 et les références y citées, et Kondrulin c. Russie, no 12987/15, § 31, 20 septembre 2016).
• EGMR, 13.04.2021 - 15593/15

  NOVAKOVSKAYA v. RUSSIA

  The practice of the Court is to strike applications out of the list when an applicant dies during the course of the proceedings and no heir or close relative wishes to pursue the case (see Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, § 57 with further references, ECHR 2012), save for in very exceptional cases where the Court finds that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto requires a continuation of the examination of the case (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 112, ECHR 2014, and Kondrulin v. Russia, no. 12987/15, § 31, 20 September 2016).