Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DEMERDZIEVA AND OTHERS v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 19315/06
• EGMR, 10.02.2021 - 19315/06

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 12.11.2002 - 46129/99

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 19315/06

  The problem in the present case is that a procedural rule has been applied in such a way as to prevent the applicants' appeal being examined on the merits, with the attendant risk that their right to the effective protection of the courts would be infringed (see, mutatis mutandis, Zvolský and Zvolská v. the Czech Republic, no. 46129/99, § 51, ECHR 2002-IX).
• KAG Freiburg, 10.12.2010 - 10/09

  Kostentragungspflicht der DCV als Dienstgeber für die durch die Teilnahme an …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 19315/06

  10/09/2010.
• EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 44353/02

  KOSTOVSKA v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 19315/06

  According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see Kostovska v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 44353/02, § 62, 15 June 2006).

• EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 14818/02

  STOJKOVIC v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 19315/06

  It considers that, for the reasons detailed in the cases of Ivanovski and Others and Stojkovic, which likewise apply to this case, the third applicant's widow has the requisite standing under Article 34 of the Convention in respect of his complaints (see, mutatis mutandis, Ivanovski and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 34188/03, § 18, 26 November 2009, and Stojkovic v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 14818/02, § 25, 26, 8 November 2007).
• EGMR, 26.11.2009 - 34188/03

  IVANOVSKI AND OTHERS v. "THE FORMER YOUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 19315/06

  It considers that, for the reasons detailed in the cases of Ivanovski and Others and Stojkovic, which likewise apply to this case, the third applicant's widow has the requisite standing under Article 34 of the Convention in respect of his complaints (see, mutatis mutandis, Ivanovski and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 34188/03, § 18, 26 November 2009, and Stojkovic v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 14818/02, § 25, 26, 8 November 2007).
• EGMR, 05.04.2017 - 10649/03

  FETAOVSKI AGAINST "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 19315/06

  In the circumstances of the present case, the Court considers that the Supreme Court erroneously rejected the applicants' appeal on points of law of 16 May 2005 depriving them of their right of access to a court (see, mutatis mutandis, Fetaovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 10649/03, §§ 37-41, 19 June 2008).
• EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 49619/06

  MAMUDOVSKI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 19315/06

  Other provisions relevant to the present case were described in the cases of Gorgievski and Mamudovski (see Gorgievski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 18002/02, 6 May 2008, and Mamudovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 49619/06, 10 March 2009).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen