Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  REDGRAVE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 34, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 02.08.1984 - 8691/79

  MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 20271/92

  Similarly, in the Malone case, the Court agreed with the Commission that the existence of laws and practices permitting and establishing a system for effecting secret surveillance amounted in itself to an interference with the applicant's rights under Article 8 (Art. 8) of the Convention, apart from any measures actually taken against him (Eur. Court H.R., Malone judgment of 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82, p. 31 para. 64).

  In addition, where the implementation of the law consists of secret measures, not open to scrutiny by the individuals concerned or by the public at large, the law itself, as opposed to the accompanying administrative practice, must indicate the scope of any discretion conferred on the competent authority with sufficient clarity, having regard to the legitimate aim of the measure in question, to give the individual adequate protection against arbitrary interference (see the above-mentioned Malone judgment, Series A no. 82, pp. 32-33, para. 68).".

• EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71

  Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 20271/92

  The Commission recalls however that "an individual under certain conditions, claim to be a victim of a violation occasioned by the mere existence of secret measures... without having to allege that such measures were in fact applied to him" (Eur. Court H.R., Klass judgment of 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28, p. 18 para. 34).
• EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81

  LEANDER c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 20271/92

  In the LEANDER case (Eur. Court H.R., Leander judgment of 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116) it stated:.
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 20271/92

  It only applies if the individual can be said to have an "arguable claim" of a violation of the Convention (Eur. Court H.R., Boyle and Rice judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, para. 52).
• EKMR, 06.07.1988 - 12015/86

  HILTON c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 01.09.1993 - 20271/92

  It is sufficient, in the area of secret measures, that the existence of practices permitting secret surveillance be established and that there is a reasonable likelihood that the Security Service has compiled and retained information concerning her private life (see e.g. Application No. 12015/86, Dec. 6.7.88, D.R. 57 p.108).

• EKMR, 16.10.1996 - 28576/95

  MATTHEWS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  It is sufficient, in the area of secret measures, that the existence of practices permitting secret surveillance be established and that there is a reasonable likelihood that the Security Service has compiled and retained information concerning his private life (see. e.g. Nos. 18601/91, Dec. 4.4.1993, 20271/92, Dec. 1.9.1993, 20317/92, Dec 1.9.1993 (unpublished) with further references).