Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  OSVATH v. HUNGARY

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-4 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 16.11.2004 - 20723/02
• EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 20723/02

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (3)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63

  Neumeister ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 20723/02

  Finally, the Government drew attention to the case of Neumeister v. Austria (judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 8) in which the Court had held that the principle of equality of arms need not be given full effect in the context of decisions relating to detention on remand.
• EGMR, 26.07.2001 - 33977/96

  ILIJKOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 20723/02

  In these circumstances, the Court is satisfied that the applicant did not receive the benefit of a procedure that was really adversarial (cf. Nikolova v. Bulgaria, no. 31195/96, ECHR 1999-II, § 63, Niedbała v. Poland, no. 27915/95, judgment of 4 Jul 2000, and Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, judgment of 26 July 2001).
• EGMR, 04.07.2000 - 27915/95

  NIEDBALA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 20723/02

  In these circumstances, the Court is satisfied that the applicant did not receive the benefit of a procedure that was really adversarial (cf. Nikolova v. Bulgaria, no. 31195/96, ECHR 1999-II, § 63, Niedbała v. Poland, no. 27915/95, judgment of 4 Jul 2000, and Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, judgment of 26 July 2001).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 15.01.2008 - 28481/03

  LASZKIEWICZ v. POLAND

  The Court finds that even if the applicant was represented at the hearings concerning her detention, this possibility was not sufficient to afford her a proper opportunity to comment on the prosecution's motions (see, Osváth v. Hungary, no. 20723/02, § 18, 5 July 2005).