Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GOREA v. MOLDOVA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-1 (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 21984/05
• EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 21984/05

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97

  JECIUS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 21984/05

  It awards the applicant the total sum of EUR 9, 000 for non-pecuniary damage (see Baranowski, cited above, § 82 and Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 109, ECHR 2000-IX).
• EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 3456/05

  SARBAN v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 21984/05

  The applicant stated that the criminal investigation against Mr Sarban had been invented for political purposes and that there had been no lawful reason for initiating it (see Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 18, 4 October 2005).
• EGMR, 07.11.2006 - 30649/05

  HOLOMIOV v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 21984/05

  It recalls the respondent Government's and the domestic courts' position in a number of recent cases (see Boicenco v. Moldova, no. 41088/05, § 146, 11 July 2006 and Holomiov v. Moldova, no. 30649/05, § 123, 7 November 2006), in which the Government considered the practice to be lawful and based on a number of provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
• EGMR, 04.10.2006 - 76642/01

  ASSOCIATION SOS ATTENTATS ET DE BOERY c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 21984/05

  The Court recalls that it "enjoys a wide discretion in identifying grounds capable of being relied upon in striking out an application on this basis, it being understood, however, that such grounds must reside in the particular circumstances of each case" (see Association SOS Attentats and de Boery v. France [GC], (dec.), no. 76642/01, § 37, ECHR 2006-... and the principles mentioned therein regarding the application of Article 37 § 1 of the Convention).
• EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 35207/03

  OSTROVAR v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 21984/05

  Even though the size of the cell which he shared with three other prisoners could potentially raise an issue under Article 3 of the Convention (see Ostrovar v. Moldova, no. 35207/03, § 60, 13 September 2005), it is to be observed that he was only confined there for a period of 14 days.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 19312/06

  VERGELSKYY v. UKRAINE

  Depending on the nature of a complaint, the Court may study non-documented sources, such as testimonies of other inmates (see e.g. Gorea v. Moldova, no. 21984/05, § 29, 17 July 2007) or draw inferences from the failure of the Government to present convincing evidence overturning the applicant's submissions, where they have been clearly and consistently formulated (see e.g. Trepashkin, § 85).
• EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 45422/13

  ESANU c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

  In the Court's view, this situation in itself created the risk of the applicant being abused (see Gorea v. Moldova, no. 21984/05, § 47, 17 July 2007).