Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NIZAMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Uzbekistan) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Nizamov and Others v. Russia

Wird zitiert von ... (8)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 14743/11

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2014 - 22636/13

  In those earlier cases it has found that reliable international materials have demonstrated the persistence of a serious issue of ill-treatment of detainees, the practice of torture against those in police custody being described as "systematic" and "indiscriminate", and a lack of evidence demonstrating any fundamental improvement in that area (see among many others, Ismoilov and Others v. Russia, no. 2947/06, § 121, 24 April 2008; Garayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 53688/08, § 71, 10 June 2010; and Abdulkhakov v. Russia, no. 14743/11, § 141, 2 October 2012).
• EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 17455/11

  UMIROV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2014 - 22636/13

  The relevant provisions of domestic law and practice are set out in the judgment of Umirov v. Russia (no. 17455/11, §§ 41-85, 18 September 2012).
• EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 53688/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2014 - 22636/13

  In those earlier cases it has found that reliable international materials have demonstrated the persistence of a serious issue of ill-treatment of detainees, the practice of torture against those in police custody being described as "systematic" and "indiscriminate", and a lack of evidence demonstrating any fundamental improvement in that area (see among many others, Ismoilov and Others v. Russia, no. 2947/06, § 121, 24 April 2008; Garayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 53688/08, § 71, 10 June 2010; and Abdulkhakov v. Russia, no. 14743/11, § 141, 2 October 2012).
• EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 67286/10

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2014 - 22636/13

  For a summary of the relevant reports by the UN institutions and international NGOs on Uzbekistan during the period between 2002 and 2011, see Zokhidov v. Russia, no. 67286/10, §§ 107-13, 5 February 2013).
• EGMR, 29.07.2010 - 54219/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2014 - 22636/13

  It has been the Court's consistent view that there was ongoing violent persecution of the member or supporters of such organisations, whose underlying aims appeared to be both religious and political and in contradiction with the policies pursued by the government in Uzbekistan (see, for example, Karimov v. Russia, no. 54219/08, §§ 96-102, 29 July 2010, and Umirov, cited above, §§ 106-22, 18 September 2012).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 29217/12

  Rückführung einer afghanischen Familie nach Italien konventionskonform?

  137. The Court considers that its finding in paragraph 122 of the present judgment constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any nonpecuniary damage sustained by the applicants (see, to this effect, Beldjoudi v. France, 26 March 1992, §§ 79 and 86, Series A no. 234-A; M. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 41416/08, §§ 105 and 143, 26 July 2011; and Nizamov and Others v. Russia, nos. 22636/13, 24034/13, 24334/13 and 24328/13, § 50, 7 May 2014).
• EGMR, 23.03.2016 - 43611/11

  F.G. v. SWEDEN

  22636/13, 24034/13, 24334/13 and 24528/13, § 50, 7 May 2014).
• EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 58923/14

  KHOLMURODOV c. RUSSIE

  Aux yeux de la Cour, ces accusations sont indubitablement à caractère politique et religieux, ce qui place le requérant dans le groupe des personnes particulièrement vulnérables encourant le risque de mauvais traitements en cas de retour en Ouzbékistan (Nizamov et autres c. Russie, nos 22636/13, 24034/13, 24334/13 et 24528/13, § 41-43, 7 mai 2014).

• EGMR, 26.01.2017 - 42332/14

  KHAMIDKARIYEV v. RUSSIA

  Against that background, and having regard to the information summarised in paragraphs 96-99 above, the Court cannot but confirm that the ill-treatment of detainees remains a pervasive and enduring problem in Uzbekistan (see Nizamov and Others v. Russia, nos. 22636/13 and 3 others, § 40, 7 May 2014).
• EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 20999/14

  MUKHITDINOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court has been previously confronted with many cases concerning forced return from Russia to Uzbekistan of the persons accused by the Uzbek authorities of criminal, religious and political activities (see most recently, Egamberdiyev v. Russia, no. 34742/13, 26 June 2014; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, 28 May 2014; Nizamov and Others v. Russia, nos. 22636/13, 24034/13, 24334/13 and 24528/13, 7 May 2014, with further references).
• EGMR, 26.02.2015 - 66373/13

  KHALIKOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court has previously had the task of examining many cases concerning the forced return from Russia to Uzbekistan of persons accused by the Uzbek authorities of criminal, religious and political activities (see, most recently, Egamberdiyev cited above; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, 28 May 2014; and Nizamov and Others v. Russia, nos. 22636/13, 24034/13, 24334/13 and 24528/13, 7 May 2014, with further references).
• EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 68900/13

  ESHONKULOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court has been previously confronted with many cases concerning forced return from Russia to Uzbekistan of the persons accused by the Uzbek authorities of criminal, religious and political activities (see most recently, Egamberdiyev v. Russia, no. 34742/13, 26 June 2014; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, 28 May 2014; Nizamov and Others v. Russia, nos. 22636/13, 24034/13, 24334/13 and 24528/13, 7 May 2014, with further references).
• EGMR, 11.12.2014 - 74759/13

  FOZIL NAZAROV v. RUSSIA

  22636/13, 24034/13, 24334/13 and 24528/13, §§ 41 and 42, 7 May 2014).