Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MATTHILDUR INGVARSDOTTIR v. ICELAND

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  INGVARSDOTTIR v. ICELAND

  Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 4 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (2)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.02.2009 - 14939/03

  Sergeï Zolotoukhine ./. Russland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 22779/14

  The notion of the "same offence" - the idem element of the ne bis in idem principle in Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - is to be understood as prohibiting the prosecution or conviction of a second "offence" in so far as it arises from identical facts or facts which are substantially the same (see Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939/03, § 78-84, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 18.05.2017 - 22007/11

  JOHANNESSON AND OTHERS v. ICELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 22779/14

  The applicant maintained that the material facts of her case were the same as in the case of Johannesson and Others v. Iceland (no. 22007/11, 18 May 2017).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 12951/18

  KRISTJÁNSSON v. ICELAND

  The chronology of the facts thus makes it clear that the establishment of facts made in the tax proceedings, in particular the finding that the applicant had submitted incorrect tax returns, was relied upon in the criminal proceedings (compare A and B v. Norway, cited above, §§ 146 and 152; see also Matthildur Ingvarsdóttir v. Iceland (committee) (dec.), no. 22779/14, § 59, 4 December 2018, and, a contrario, Jóhannesson and Others v. Iceland, no. 22007/11, § 53, 18 May 2017).