Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ZHULIN v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ZHULIN v. RUSSIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. b MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

  KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 22965/06

  The Court reiterates that detention without a court order or other clear legal ground is incompatible with the standard of "lawfulness", enshrined in Article 5 § 1, since during the time of unauthorised detention an individual would be kept in a legal vacuum not covered by any domestic legal provision (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 149, ECHR 2005-X (extracts), and Lebedev v. Russia, no. 4493/04, § 57, 25 October 2007).
• EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05

  MAMEDOVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 22965/06

  The procedure under Article 5 § 4 must have a judicial character and provide guarantees appropriate to the kind of deprivation of liberty in question, including the possibility for a detainee to be heard either in person or through some form of representation (see Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 89, 1 June 2006, with further references).
• EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 4493/04

  LEBEDEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 22965/06

  The Court reiterates that detention without a court order or other clear legal ground is incompatible with the standard of "lawfulness", enshrined in Article 5 § 1, since during the time of unauthorised detention an individual would be kept in a legal vacuum not covered by any domestic legal provision (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 149, ECHR 2005-X (extracts), and Lebedev v. Russia, no. 4493/04, § 57, 25 October 2007).
• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 1600/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 22965/06

  The scope of judicial review under Article 5 § 4 should be wide enough to bear on those conditions which are essential for the detention of a person to be lawful within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (see Koroleva v. Russia, no. 1600/09, § 110, 13 November 2012, with further references).
• EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 40025/10

  LAGUNOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 22965/06

  The Court further reiterates that, in the light of the prominent place that the right to liberty has in a democratic society, it has consistently rejected the application of the "no significant disadvantage" admissibility criterion in relation to complaints under Article 5 of the Convention (see Van Velden v. the Netherlands, no. 30666/08, §§ 33-39, 19 July 2011; Sýkora v. the Czech Republic, no. 23419/07, § 55, 22 November 2012; Bannikov v. Latvia, no. 19279/03, § 58, 11 June 2013; and Lagunov v. Russia, no. 40025/10, § 13, 1 March 2016).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 9096/09

  ABASHEV CONTRE LA RUSSIE ET 122 AUTRES AFFAIRES

  22965/06.
• EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 65367/16

  ZELCS v. LATVIA

  In the light of the prominent place that the right to liberty has in a democratic society, the Court has so far rejected the application of the "no significant disadvantage" admissibility criterion in relation to complaints under Article 5 of the Convention (see Van Velden v. the Netherlands, no. 30666/08, §§ 33-39, 19 July 2011; Sýkora v. the Czech Republic, no. 23419/07, § 56, 22 November 2012; Bannikov v. Latvia, no. 19279/03, § 58, 11 June 2013; Lagunov v. Russia [Committee], no. 40025/10, § 13, 1 March 2016; and Zhulin v. Russia [Committee], no. 22965/06, § 15, 18 October 2016).