Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  WIERZBICKI v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10 MRK
  No violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 26.02.1996 - 24541/94
• EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 24541/94

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 24541/94

  As regards litigation involving opposing private interests, equality of arms implies that each party must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his case - including his evidence - under conditions that do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (see the Dombo Beheer v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1993, Series A no. 274, pp. 18-19, §§ 31-33).
• EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 24541/94

  Article 6 § 1 places the "tribunal" under a duty to conduct a proper examination of the submissions, arguments and evidence adduced by the parties, without prejudice to its assessment of whether they are relevant to its decision (see the Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no. 288, p. 19, § 59).
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87

  EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 24541/94

  In this connection, the Court reiterates that it is the domestic courts which are best placed for assessing the relevance of evidence to the issues in the case (see, amongst many authorities, the Vidal v. Belgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, § 32; the Edwards v. the United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, § 34).

• EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 24541/94

  In this connection, the Court reiterates that it is the domestic courts which are best placed for assessing the relevance of evidence to the issues in the case (see, amongst many authorities, the Vidal v. Belgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, § 32; the Edwards v. the United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, § 34).
• AG Reichenbach, 12.08.1993 - C 88/93

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 24541/94

  On the other hand, in certain decisions given on the basis of Article 139 of the Election Law, the courts held that that provision in conjunction with Article 6 of the Civil Code required the plaintiff to prove that the statements contained in the contested publications were untrue (the Katowice Regional Court, II Ns 88/93, Dec. 10.09.1993; the Katowice Regional Court I Acz 660/93, Dec. 18.09.1993).
• RG, 09.05.1893 - 60/93

  1. Von welcher Stelle ist die in der Anmerkung zu Nr. 25 q 2 des Zolltarifes vom …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 24541/94

  Thus the plaintiff was exempted from the obligation to demonstrate that the allegations against him were untrue (the Kielce Regional Court, I Ns 60/93, Dec.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 10.04.2025 - C-136/24

  Schadensersatzklage gegen Frontex: Generalanwalt Norkus analysiert die Verteilung …

  {FN:68} Vgl. EGMR, 18. Juni 2002, Wierzbicki/Polen (CE:ECHR:2002:0618JUD002454194, § 39).