Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 3, Art. 8 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (4)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.05.2008 - 26565/05

  N. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 25087/06

  The Court recalls that in N. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 26565/05, §§ 42-43, ECHR 2008, it held as follows:.
• EGMR, 31.01.2006 - 50435/99

  Schutz von Ehe und Familie, Abschiebung, Duldung, unerlaubter Aufenthalt, Kinder

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 25087/06

  The Court has previously held that where this is the case it is likely only to be in the most exceptional circumstances that the removal of the non-national family member will constitute a violation of Article 8 (see Rodrigues da Silva and Hoogkamer v. the Netherlands, no. 50435/99, § 39, ECHR 2006; Mitchell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 40447/98, 24 November 1998, and Ajayi and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27663/95, 22 June 1999).
• EGMR, 24.11.1998 - 40447/98

  MITCHELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 25087/06

  The Court has previously held that where this is the case it is likely only to be in the most exceptional circumstances that the removal of the non-national family member will constitute a violation of Article 8 (see Rodrigues da Silva and Hoogkamer v. the Netherlands, no. 50435/99, § 39, ECHR 2006; Mitchell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 40447/98, 24 November 1998, and Ajayi and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27663/95, 22 June 1999).
• EGMR, 22.06.1999 - 27663/95

  AJAYI AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 25087/06

  The Court has previously held that where this is the case it is likely only to be in the most exceptional circumstances that the removal of the non-national family member will constitute a violation of Article 8 (see Rodrigues da Silva and Hoogkamer v. the Netherlands, no. 50435/99, § 39, ECHR 2006; Mitchell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 40447/98, 24 November 1998, and Ajayi and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27663/95, 22 June 1999).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 03.10.2014 - 12738/10

  [ENG]

  En vertu d'une jurisprudence constante de la Cour, lorsque tel est le cas ce n'est en principe que dans des circonstances exceptionnelles que l'éloignement du membre de la famille ressortissant d'un pays tiers emporte violation de l'article 8 (Abdulaziz, Cabales et Balkandali c. Royaume-Uni, 28 mai 1985, § 68, série A no 94, Mitchell c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 40447/98, 24 novembre 1998, Ajayi et autres c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 27663/95, 22 juin 1999, M. c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 25087/06, 24 juin 2008, Rodrigues da Silva et Hoogkamer, précité, § 39, Arvelo Aponte, précité, §§ 57-58, et Butt, précité, § 78).