Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JAWORSKI v. POLAND

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-3 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses - claim dismissed (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 25715/02

  Continued detention can be justified in a given case only if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty laid down in Article 5 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 110-111, ECHR 2000-X).

• EGMR, 20.02.2007 - 54476/00

  PYRAK v. POLAND

  The relevant provisions of the domestic law relating to preventive measures are summarised in several judgments concerning similar cases (see, among others, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 75-81, ECHR 2000-XI; Jaworski v. Poland, no. 25715/02, §§ 20-27, 28 March 2006).
• EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 18967/02

  PISARKIEWICZ v. POLAND

  The relevant provisions of the domestic law relating to preventive measures are summarised in several judgments concerning similar cases (see, among others, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 75-81, ECHR 2000-XI; Jaworski v. Poland, no. 25715/02, §§ 20-27, 28 March 2006).
• EGMR, 06.02.2007 - 62323/00

  NAJDECKI v. POLAND

  The relevant provisions of the domestic law relating to preventive measures are summarised in several judgments concerning similar cases (see, among others, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 75-81, ECHR 2000-XI; Jaworski v. Poland, no. 25715/02, §§ 20-27, 28 March 2006).