Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LETICA v. CROATIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 27846/05

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 29182/03

  KOZLICA v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 27846/05

  The Court further recalls that, when the compensation awarded by the national authorities in respect of the length of proceedings has been found insufficient, the Court is called upon to examine the overall length of the impugned proceedings (see, mutatis mutandis, Kozlica v. Croatia, no. 29182/03, § 23, 2 November 2006).
• EGMR, 22.08.2006 - 58174/00

  RISKOVA v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 27846/05

  The Court shall take this period into consideration when determining the merits of the case and, if appropriate, the applicants' claim for just satisfaction under Article 41 of the Convention (see Solárová and Others v. Slovakia, cited above, § 42; Risková v. Slovakia, no. 58174/00, § 90, 22 August 2006).
• EGMR, 05.12.2006 - 77690/01

  SOLAROVA AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 27846/05

  Given the above finding that the applicants may still claim to be "victims" of the alleged violation, the examination of the total length is warranted (see Solárová and Others v. Slovakia, no. 77690/01, §§ 41 and 43, 5 December 2006).
• EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 29759/04

  MACINKOVIC CONTRE LA CROATIE ET 6 AUTRES AFFAIRES

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 27846/05

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Mahmutovic v. Croatia, no. 9505/03, 15 February 2007).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 07.01.2016 - 39380/13

  VRTAR v. CROATIA

  An applicant should also be awarded an amount in respect of stages of the proceedings that may not have been taken into account by the domestic courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Cocchiarella, cited above, §§ 139-141, ECHR 2006-V; Jakupović v. Croatia, no. 12419/04, § 33, 31 July 2007; Skokandić v. Croatia, no. 43714/02, § 59, 31 July 2007; Husić v. Croatia, no. 14878/04, § 31, 25 October 2007; and Letica v. Croatia, no. 27846/05, § 34, 18 October 2007).
• EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 17656/07

  ALAGIC CONTRE LA CROATIE ET 21 AUTRES AFFAIRES

  27846/05.
• EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 4255/10

  MARELJA v. CROATIA

  An applicant should also be awarded an amount in respect of stages of the proceedings that may not have been taken into account by the domestic courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], cited above, §§ 139-141; Jakupovic v. Croatia, no. 12419/04, § 33, 31 July 2007; Skokandic v. Croatia, no. 43714/02, § 59, 31 July 2007; Husic v. Croatia, no. 14878/04, § 31, 25 October 2007; and Letica v. Croatia, no. 27846/05, § 34, 18 October 2007).
• EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 42969/09

  LONCAR v. CROATIA

  An applicant should also be awarded an amount in respect of stages of the proceedings that may not have been taken into account by the domestic courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], cited above, §§ 139-141; Jakupovic v. Croatia, no. 12419/04, § 33, 31 July 2007; Skokandic v. Croatia, no. 43714/02, § 59, 31 July 2007; Husic v. Croatia, no. 14878/04, § 31, 25 October 2007; and Letica v. Croatia, no. 27846/05, § 34, 18 October 2007).
• EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 58650/12

  CARIC v. CROATIA

  An applicant should also be awarded an amount in respect of stages of the proceedings that may not have been taken into account by the domestic courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], cited above, §§ 139-141; Jakupovic v. Croatia, no. 12419/04, § 33, 31 July 2007; Skokandic v. Croatia, no. 43714/02, § 59, 31 July 2007; Husic v. Croatia, no. 14878/04, § 31, 25 October 2007; and Letica v. Croatia, no. 27846/05, § 34, 18 October 2007).