Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  M.S.D. v. ROMANIA

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  M.S.D. v. ROMANIA

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Zitiert selbst (10)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02

  Opuz ./. Türkei

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.12.2024 - 28935/21

  Rn. 120 The Court reiterates that States have a positive obligation to establish and apply effectively a system that punishes all forms of domestic violence, whether occurring offline or online, and to provide sufficient safeguards for and adequate protection measures in respect of the victims of domestic violence in the form of effective deterrence against serious breaches of their physical and psychological integrity (see Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 145, ECHR 2009, and Volodina (no. 2), cited above, §§ 49 and 58).
• EGMR, 09.02.2021 - 40591/11

  N.Ç. c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.12.2024 - 28935/21

  v. Turkey, no. 40591/11, § 97, 9 February 2021, in the context of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention; and J.L. v Italy, cited above, § 124).
• EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 2872/02

  Pädophile im Netz - Finnland zu Strafe verurteilt

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.12.2024 - 28935/21

  Rn. 103 The national authorities had failed to effectively protect her against the online harassment given the ineffective manner in which they had conducted the investigation in respect of her case (reference was made to K.U. v. Finland (no. 2872/02, ECHR 2008) and Volodina (no. 2) (cited above).

• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 41720/13

  NICOLAE VIRGILIU TANASE v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.12.2024 - 28935/21

  The Court reiterates that the concept of "private life" within the meaning of Article 8 is a broad term which is not susceptible to exhaustive definition, which covers also the physical and psychological integrity of a person (see Nicolae Virgiliu Tănase v. Romania [GC], no. 41720/13, § 126, 25 June 2019, with further references).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.12.2024 - 28935/21

  Rn. 98 The Government have not raised any express concerns or objections relating to the applicant's impugned statements (contrast Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, §§ 98 and 126, 20 March 2018).
• EGMR, 27.05.2021 - 5671/16

  J.L. c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.12.2024 - 28935/21

  The relevant provisions of the Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence of 7 April 2011 ("the Istanbul Convention"), which entered into force in respect of Romania on 1 September 2016, are presented in M.G. v. Turkey (no. 646/10, § 54, 22 March 2016) and J.L. v. Italy (no. 5671/16, § 65, 27 May 2021).
• EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 56867/15

  BUTURUGA c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.12.2024 - 28935/21

  The relevant findings of an EU-wide survey carried out between March and September 2012 by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights and of a report on "Cyber violence against women and girls" produced by the European Institute for Gender Equality in 2017, pertinent at the time of the events in the instant case, were set out in Buturugă v. Romania (no. 56867/15, §§ 41-42, 11 February 2020).
• EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 40419/19

  VOLODINA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.12.2024 - 28935/21

  Further relevant findings of (i) a 2015 report entitled "Cyberviolence against Women and Girls: A World-wide Wake-up Call" by the UNESCO-ITU Broadband Commission for Digital Development's Working Group on Broadband and Gender, (ii) a report on online violence against women and girls from a human-rights perspective (A/HRC/38/47, 18 June 2018) issued by the United Nations Human Rights Council's Special Rapporteur on violence against women, and (iii) a mapping study on online violence (released on 9 July 2018) conducted by the Cybercrime Convention Working Group on online bullying and other forms of online violence (especially against women and children), are set out in Volodina v. Russia (no. 2) (no. 40419/19, §§ 22-24, 14 September 2021).
• EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 646/10

  ERSOY c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.12.2024 - 28935/21

  The relevant provisions of the Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence of 7 April 2011 ("the Istanbul Convention"), which entered into force in respect of Romania on 1 September 2016, are presented in M.G. v. Turkey (no. 646/10, § 54, 22 March 2016) and J.L. v. Italy (no. 5671/16, § 65, 27 May 2021).
• EGMR, 14.05.2020 - 48534/10

  RODINA v. LATVIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.12.2024 - 28935/21

  Only the above-mentioned interpretation afforded practical and effective protection to a person's private life from the perspective of a State's positive obligations under Article 8 of the Convention, as reflected by the case-law of the Court (reference was made to Rodina v. Latvia, nos. 48534/10 and 19532/15, 14 May 2020).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 16.06.2026 - 27737/22

  M.S. AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  Such findings, which are in stark contrast with those of the DGASPC (see paragraph 14 above), raise serious concerns about the apparent absence of (or lack of quality in) training centred on the needs of the children victims of such acts, which the respondent State is bound under its international obligations to provide to those of its professional personnel who deal in criminal proceedings with victims of violence (see M.Ş.D. v. Romania, no. 28935/21, § 147, 3 December 2024).
• EGMR - 4071/21 (anhängig)

  BOZKURT v. TÜRKİYE

  Did the State have a positive obligation under Article 8 of the Convention to conduct an effective investigation into the applicant's allegations? If so, was the conduct of the criminal proceedings against the police officers compatible with the procedural obligations inherent in Article 8 of the Convention (see Manukyan v. Armenia, no. 5778/17, §§ 65-67, 13 November 2025; M.Ş.D. v. Romania, no. 28935/21, § 125, 3 December 2024; M.D. and Others v. Spain, no. 36584/17, § 58, 28 June 2022; F.O. v. Croatia, cited above, § 91; and H.M. v. Turkey, no. 34494/97, §§ 26-30, 8 August 2006)?.
• EGMR - 28658/25 (anhängig)

  A.H. c. FRANCE

  Les autorités internes ont-elles pris toutes les mesures nécessaires, adéquates et effectives pour protéger la dignité, l'intégrité et la vie privée de la requérante - victime présumée de violences sexuelles - notamment en empêchant la diffusion des vidéos la représentant lors des faits allégués (M.Ş.D. c. Roumanie, no 28935/21, §§ 118-121, 3 décembre 2024, et X c. Chypre, no 40733/22, § 89, 27 février 2025) ?.

• EGMR - 4200/25 (anhängig)

  A.I.L. v. ROMANIA

  Did the national authorities discharge their obligation under Article 8 of the Convention of effectively protecting the applicant's right to respect for her private life given her young age at the time of the impugned events? Did they conduct a prompt and effective investigation into the unlawful copying and public dissemination of her intimate photographs by her classmates, which had had a dissuasive effect, had avoided her alleged secondary victimisation, and had remedied the alleged damage caused to her by her classmates' actions (compare M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, §§ 150 and 152-53, ECHR 2003-XII; K.U. v. Finland, no. 2872/02, §§ 41-43, ECHR 2008; and M.Ş.D. v. Romania, no. 28935/21, §§ 121, 138 and 156, 3 December 2024)?.
• EGMR - 17650/25 (anhängig)

  A c. FRANCE

  Eu égard aux obligations positives incombant à l'État défendeur en vertu des articles 3 et 8 de la Convention, les autorités internes ont-elles pris toutes les mesures nécessaires, adéquates et effectives pour protéger la dignité, l'intégrité et la vie privée de la requérante - victime présumée de violences sexuelles - notamment en empêchant la diffusion et le maintien en ligne d'images et de vidéos la représentant lors des faits allégués (M.Ş.D. c. Roumanie, no 28935/21, §§ 118-121, 3 décembre 2024 et X c. Chypre, no 40733/22, § 89, 27 février 2025) ?.
• EGMR - 21757/26 (anhängig)

  G.C. v. GREECE

  Did the State authorities in the present case comply with their positive obligations under Article 8 of the Convention to conduct an effective investigation into the alleged offences of child pornography and to enact the relevant criminal law provisions effectively (see K.U. v. Finland, no. 2872/02, §§ 40-44, ECHR 2008, Buturugă v. Romania, no. 56867/15, §§ 73-78, 11 February 2020; Volodina v. Russia (no. 2), no. 40419/19, §§ 47-49, 14 September 2021)? In particular, did the State authorities safeguard the physical and psychological integrity of the applicant (see R.B. v. Estonia, no. 22597/16, §§ 78-84, 22 June 2021, and M.Ş.D. v. Romania, no. 28935/21, §§ 115-121, 3 December 2024)?.
• EGMR, 13.05.2025 - 22331/20

  CIONCA v. ROMANIA

  À défaut de circonstances très particulières, que le Gouvernement n'a pas mis en avant, un tel manquement des autorités d'éviter une telle issue est en soi de nature à jeter de forts doutes sur leur capacité et volonté de conduire une enquête prompte et approfondie, ce qui est crucial pour maintenir la confiance du public dans l'État du droit (comparer avec M.Ş.D. c. Roumanie, no 28935/21, § 154, 3 décembre 2024).