Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.10.2016 - 30198/11 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
STROGAN v. UKRAINE
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - ...
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (7) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2016 - 30198/11
Although it is in the first place for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law, under Article 5 § 1 a failure to comply with domestic law entails a breach of the Convention, and the Court can and should review whether that law has been complied with (see, among many other references, Benham v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, § 41, Reports 1996-III, and Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 171, ECHR 2004-II).
- EGMR, 22.10.2018 - 35553/12
Urteil bestätigt Präventivhaft: EGMR lässt Polizei Spielraum im Umgang mit …
(iii) Necessity 77. In the context of the first limb of subparagraph (c) of paragraph 1 (reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence) of Article 5, the Court has held that "[i]n order for deprivation of liberty to be considered free from arbitrariness, it does not suffice that this measure is executed in conformity with national law; it must also be necessary in the circumstances" (see, among other authorities, Ladent v. Poland, no. 11036/03, § 55, 18 March 2008; Khayredinov v. Ukraine, no. 38717/04, § 27, 14 October 2010; Korneykova v. Ukraine, no. 39884/05, §§ 34 and 43, 19 January 2012; and Strogan v. Ukraine, no. 30198/11, § 86, 6 October 2016). - EGMR, 24.02.2022 - 6768/11
LIFINTSEV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
In the leading cases of Kharchenko v. Ukraine (no. 40107/02, §§ 70-72 and 74-76, 10 February 2011), Ruslan Yakovenko v. Ukraine (no. 5425/11, §§ 68-70, 4 June 2015), Strogan v. Ukraine (no. 30198/11, §§ 88-89, 6 October 2016), Ignatov v. Ukraine (no. 40583/15, §§ 36-37, 15 December 2016), Fortalnov and Others v. Russia (nos. 7077/06 and 12 others, §§ 76-79, 26 June 2018) and Grubnyk v. Ukraine (no. 58444/15, §§ 71-73 and 83-85, 17 September 2020), the Court found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case (see the appended table).No legal basis for arrest without a prior court decision (Strogan v. Ukraine, no. 30198/11,.
No legal basis for arrest without a prior court decision (Strogan v. Ukraine, no. 30198/11,.
No legal basis for arrest without a prior court decision (Strogan v. Ukraine, no. 30198/11,.
- EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 12260/15
SHOLOMYTSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
No legal basis for arrest without a prior court decision (Strogan v. Ukraine, no. 30198/11,.No legal basis for arrest without a prior court decision (Strogan v. Ukraine, no.30198/11, §§ 88-89, 6 October 2016, and Grubnyk v. Ukraine, no. 58444/15, §§ 83-85, 17 September 2020).
- EGMR, 24.02.2022 - 72970/13
GRYSHKO AND KOSHLYAK v. UKRAINE
In the leading cases of Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, §§ 74-76, 10 February 2011, Strogan v. Ukraine, no. 30198/11, §§ 88-89, 6 October 2016 and Grubnyk v. Ukraine, no. 58444/15, §§ 83-85, 17 September 2020, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.no legal basis for arrest without a prior court decision (Strogan v. Ukraine, no. 30198/11, §§ 87-89, 6 October 2016, and Grubnyk v. Ukraine, no. 58444/15,.
- EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 29978/14
SPESYVTSEV v. UKRAINE
no legal basis for arrest without a prior court decision (Strogan v. Ukraine, no. 30198/11,. - EGMR, 19.10.2023 - 47954/16
USHAKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
No legal basis for arrest without a prior court decision (Strogan v. Ukraine, no. 30198/11, §§ 88-89, 6 October 2016, and Grubnyk v. Ukraine, no. 58444/15, §§ 83-85, 17 September 2020). - EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 23946/20
GLADKOVSKYY v. UKRAINE
30198/11, §§ 88-89, 6 October 2016, and Grubnyk v. Ukraine, no. 58444/15,.