Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VASKRSIC v. SLOVENIA

  Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  VASKRSIC v. SLOVENIA

  Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 25.04.2017 - 31371/12
• EGMR, 04.07.2018 - 31371/12

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2017 - 31371/12

  As the Court has consistently held, the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions must strike a "fair balance" between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual's fundamental rights (see, among other authorities, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 69, Series A no. 52, and Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720/99, 72203/01 and 72552/01, § 93, ECHR 2005-VI).
• EGMR, 15.05.2003 - 72203/01

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2017 - 31371/12

  As the Court has consistently held, the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions must strike a "fair balance" between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual's fundamental rights (see, among other authorities, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 69, Series A no. 52, and Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720/99, 72203/01 and 72552/01, § 93, ECHR 2005-VI).
• EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 32794/07

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2017 - 31371/12

  The Court reiterates that, because of their direct knowledge of their society and its needs, national authorities are in principle better placed than any international judge to decide what is "in the public interest" (see, among the most recent authorities, Matczyński v. Poland, no. 32794/07, § 99, 15 December 2015).
• EGMR, 12.07.2016 - 43777/13

  VRZIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2017 - 31371/12

  It further considers that the judicial sale of the applicant's property falls to be considered under the so-called third rule, contained in the second paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, relating to the State's right "to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest" (see, among the most recent authorities, Vrzić v. Croatia, no. 43777/13, §§ 93-96, 12 July 2016).
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Baden, 30.05.2008 - 3/07

  Pfarrerdienstrecht, Verbeamtung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2017 - 31371/12

  The Enforcement and Securing of Civil Claims Act, in force at the relevant time (Official Gazette no. 3/07 with amendments - "the Enforcement Act"), provides rules on enforcement proceedings.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen