Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  FOMIN AND SIVAYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court) (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 18.01.2007 - 20887/03

  KOT v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 3141/08

  The relevant domestic law governing the supervisory review procedure in force between 1 February 2003 and 7 January 2008 is summarised in Kot v. Russia (no. 20887/03, § 17, 18 January 2007).
• EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 14290/03

  KAZAKEVICH AND OTHER "ARMY PENSIONERS" CASES v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 3141/08

  In accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of the Court, the Court decides to consider the applications in a single judgment, given their similar factual and legal background (see Kazakevich and 9 other "Army Pensioners" cases v. Russia, nos. 14290/03 and 9 others, § 15, 14 January 2010).
• EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 36299/03

  KOVALENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 3141/08

  Some of those violations were found in similar circumstances and similarly concerned the quashing of final domestic judgments making awards (see, among many other authorities, Kovalenko and Others v. Russia, [Committee], nos. 36299/03 and 6 others, 8 December 2015, and Zelenkevich and Others v. Russia, [Committee], no. 14805/02, 20 June 2013).

• EGMR, 26.11.2009 - 22666/08

  BOTSKALEV AND ROSTOVSKAYA AND OTHER "PRIVILEGED PENSIONERS" CASES v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 3141/08

  On the other hand, the amount of compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage proposed by the Government differs substantially from the amounts of compensation awarded to the applicants by the Court in virtually identical cases (see Botskalev and Rostovtseva and 42 other "Privileged pensioners" cases v. Russia, nos. 22666/08 and 42 others, § 23, 26 November 2009, and most recent Dolbin v. Russia [Committee], no. 18451/04, §§ 19-21, 19 April 2016).
• EGMR, 20.06.2013 - 14805/02

  ZELENKEVICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 3141/08

  Some of those violations were found in similar circumstances and similarly concerned the quashing of final domestic judgments making awards (see, among many other authorities, Kovalenko and Others v. Russia, [Committee], nos. 36299/03 and 6 others, 8 December 2015, and Zelenkevich and Others v. Russia, [Committee], no. 14805/02, 20 June 2013).
• EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 18451/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 3141/08

  On the other hand, the amount of compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage proposed by the Government differs substantially from the amounts of compensation awarded to the applicants by the Court in virtually identical cases (see Botskalev and Rostovtseva and 42 other "Privileged pensioners" cases v. Russia, nos. 22666/08 and 42 others, § 23, 26 November 2009, and most recent Dolbin v. Russia [Committee], no. 18451/04, §§ 19-21, 19 April 2016).
• EGMR, 05.04.2016 - 63833/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 3141/08

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Gruzda v. Russia [Committee], no. 63833/09, 5 April 2016, and Kovalenko and Others, cited above), the Court considers it reasonable to award each applicant the sums indicated in the Appendix.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 25.07.2017 - 6131/07

  KOROBEYNIKOV v. RUSSIA

  Some of those violations were found in similar circumstances and similarly concerned the quashing of final domestic judgments making awards in respect of social benefits (see, among many other authorities, Kovalenko and Others, [Committee], nos. 36299/03 and 6 others, 8 December 2015; Zelenkevich and Others v. Russia, [Committee], no. 14805/02, 20 June 2013; and, on account of the social benefit certificates, Fomin and Sivayeva v. Russia, no. 3141/08, 16 June 2017).