Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  USTIMENKO v. UKRAINE

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

  DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.10.2015 - 32053/13

  The Court reiterates that the principle of equality of arms requires that each party should be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his case under conditions that do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (see Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1993, § 33, Series A no. 274).
• EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89

  SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.10.2015 - 32053/13

  The Court has repeatedly held that such disputes concerning the benefits payable under social security schemes are technical and may accordingly be better dealt with in writing than in oral argument (see, for example, Miller v. Sweden, no. 55853/00, § 29, 8 February 2005, and Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, § 58, Series A no. 263).
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99

  RIABYKH c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.10.2015 - 32053/13

  A departure from that principle is justified only when made necessary by circumstances of a substantial and compelling character (see Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §§ 51 and 52, ECHR 2003-X).
• EGMR, 30.11.1987 - 8950/80

  H. v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.10.2015 - 32053/13

  The very concept of "valid reasons", whereby domestic courts justified reopening the proceedings in the applicant's case, lacks precision (see, mutatis mutandis, H. v. Belgium, 30 November 1987, § 53, Series A no. 127-B, and Georgiadis v. Greece, 29 May 1997, § 43, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-III).

• EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 20261/12

  Ungarn verstößt gegen Menschenrechtskonvention

  The Court has since reiterated on numerous occasions the importance of the principle of the rule of law in the context of Article 6 of the Convention (see, purely by way of indication, Siegle v. Romania, no. 23456/04, § 32, 16 April 2013; Varniene v. Lithuania, no. 42916/04, § 37, 12 November 2013; Solomun v. Croatia, no. 679/11, § 46, 2 April 2015; Ustimenko v. Ukraine, no. 32053/13, § 46, 29 October 2015; and Amirkhanyan v. Armenia, no. 22343/08, § 33, 3 December 2015), and also of the need to take account of the relevant rules of international law in interpreting and applying the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Hassan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29750/09, §§ 100, 102, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 27128/11

  SKVYRASILRYBGOSP, VAT v. UKRAINE

  The general principles concerning the rights guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases of extension of procedural time-limits have been summarized in, among other authorities, Ponomaryov v. Ukraine (no. 3236/03, §§ 40-41, 3 April 2008) and Ustimenko v. Ukraine (no. 32053/13, §§ 46-47, 29 October 2015).
• EGMR - 32850/16 (anhängig)

  ILIRIA SRL IN LIQUIDAZIONE v. ALBANIA

  Was the decision no. 179 of 26 December 2003 of the Tirana Court of Appeal, which granted to the Albanian Government a leave to appeal out of time against the final decisions in breach of the principle of legal certainty, as provided by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see for example Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, §§ 69-70, ECHR 2007-V (extracts) and Ustimenko v. Ukraine, no. 32053/13, §§ 46-47, 29 October 2015)?.