Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BAISCHER v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses (Convention proceedings) - claim dismissed ...

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 16.01.2001 - 32381/96
• EGMR, 20.12.2001 - 32381/96

Wird zitiert von ... (10)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 18.03.2010 - 13201/05

  Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Voraussetzungen für belastende Schlüsse aus dem …

  In addition, pursuant to section 51e of the Administrative Offences Act, the Independent Administrative Panel, which was the first and only court to examine the case (see Baischer v. Austria, no. 32381/96, §§ 25-30, 20 December 2001), was not obliged to hold a hearing unless the applicant requested one.
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 09.03.2017 - C-685/15

  Online Games u.a. - Art. 49 und 56 AEUV - Glücksspiele - Glücksspielmonopol in …

  {FN:15} Vgl. u. a. EGMR, 20. Dezember 2001, Baischer/Österreich (CE:ECHR:2001:1220JUD003238196, § 22).
• EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 38544/97

  WEH AND WEH v. AUSTRIA

  It recalls that according to its established case-law administrative offences like those at issue in the present case are to be classified as "criminal" for the purposes of Article 6 which therefore applies to administrative criminal proceedings under Austrian law (see for instance the Schmautzer v. Austria judgment of 23 October 1995, Series A no. 328-A, p. 13, § 28 and as a recent authority Baischer v. Austria, no. 32381/96, 20.12.2001, § 22).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 18.07.2013 - C-60/12

  Baláž - Polizeiliche und justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen - …

  {FN:34} - Vgl. Urteile des EGMR vom 31. August 1999, Hubner/Österreich (Beschwerde Nr. 34311/96), und vom 20. Dezember 2001, Baischer/Österreich (Beschwerde Nr. 32381/96).
• EGMR, 02.09.2004 - 77413/01

  BACHMAIER v. AUSTRIA

  They may refrain from doing so when the parties concerned expressly waive their right to a hearing or when the parties' appeal only concerns points of law, or the sentence imposed, and there is no express request for a hearing to be held" (see Baischer v. Austria, no. 32381/96, § 26, 20 December 2001).
• EGMR, 10.07.2014 - 40820/12

  MARCAN v. CROATIA

  The Court notes at the outset that minor-offence proceedings concerning road traffic offences fall to be examined under the criminal limb of Article 6 of the Convention (see, for example, Baischer v. Austria, no. 32381/96, § 22, 20 December 2001; Berdajs v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 10390/09, 27 March 2012; and Mesesnel v. Slovenia, no. 22163/08, § 28, 28 February 2013).
• EGMR, 09.12.2025 - 13810/22

  KUCERA v. AUSTRIA

  Indeed, according to its established case-law, Article 6 § 1 of the Convention applies, under its criminal head, to administrative offences like the one at issue in the present case and the corresponding administrative criminal proceedings under Austrian law (see Gradinger v. Austria, 23 October 1995, § 36, Series A no. 328-C, and Baischer v. Austria, no. 32381/96, § 22, 20 December 2001; compare also with Kindlhofer v. Austria, no. 20962/15, § 30, 26 October 2021, albeit in the context of Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention).
• EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 54698/00

  KAYA v. AUSTRIA

  The Court notes that in the proceedings at issue the Independent Administrative Panel, which in proceedings at the ones at issue has to be regarded as the first and only tribunal within the meaning of Article 6 (Baischer v. Austria, no.32381/96, § 30, 20 December 2001), held a public hearing.
• EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 61595/00

  CETINKAYA v. AUSTRIA

  The Court recalls that, according to its established case-law, administrative offences like those at issue in the present case are to be classified as "criminal" for the purposes of Article 6. This provision, therefore, applies to administrative criminal proceedings under Austrian law (see for instance the Schmautzer v. Austria judgment of 23 October 1995, Series A no. 328-A, p. 13, § 28 and as a recent authority Baischer v. Austria, no. 32381/96, 20.12.2001, § 22).
• EGMR, 26.09.2002 - 65665/01

  SCHLUGA v. AUSTRIA

  The Court recalls that, according to its established case-law, administrative offences like those at issue in the present case are to be classified as "criminal" for the purposes of Article 6, which therefore applies to administrative criminal proceedings under Austrian law (see for instance the Schmautzer v. Austria judgment of 23 October 1995, Series A no. 328-A, p. 13, § 28 and as a recent authority Baischer v. Austria, no. 32381/96, 20.12.2001, § 22).